Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add filtering by store to orders index component #5870

Conversation

forkata
Copy link
Contributor

@forkata forkata commented Oct 10, 2024

Summary

In the legacy admin the order search supported a filter by store. This
behaviour is not in the new admin yet, so we're introducing it with this
change.

This PR addresses part of the concerns raised in #5614.

Screenshot
Screenshot 2024-10-10 at 2 26 22 PM

Checklist

Check out our PR guidelines for more details.

The following are mandatory for all PRs:

The following are not always needed:

  • 📖 I have updated the README to account for my changes.
  • 📑 I have documented new code with YARD.
  • 🛣️ I have opened a PR to update the guides.
  • ✅ I have added automated tests to cover my changes.
  • 📸 I have attached screenshots to demo visual changes.

In the legacy admin the order search supported a filter by store. This
behaviour is not in the new admin yet, so we're introducing it with this
change.

Co-authored-by: Harmony Evangelina <harmony@super.gd>
Co-authored-by: Tom Van Manen <tom@super.gd>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.24%. Comparing base (3a92a45) to head (7597004).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5870   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.24%   89.24%           
=======================================
  Files         754      754           
  Lines       17533    17533           
=======================================
  Hits        15647    15647           
  Misses       1886     1886           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@kennyadsl kennyadsl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@MadelineCollier MadelineCollier merged commit c3fea3e into solidusio:main Oct 16, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants