Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions ukrainian/COPYING
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
voc.txt and output.txt are licensed as CC BY-SA 3.0.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are they?

Taking a large dataset and extracting the most frequent N words is clearly highly transformative and it's not clear to me that the licence of the original text applies to the wordlist. (It's also not clear to me that it automatically doesn't, but apparently an LLM can ignore licensing of code with impunity despite being capable of regenerating significant verbatim sections of the original, whereas you couldn't recreate even one sentence of a wikipedia article working solely from this word list.)

So that's the reason why for the other languages I've just stated how the source data was licensed. Perhaps I should seek a qualified legal opinion on this.


voc.txt was generated from a dump of the Ukrainian Wikipedia like so:

perl -CS scripts/wikipedia-dump-to-freq ukwiki-latest-pages-articles.xml.bz2 10 Cyrillic > voc.freq
scripts/freq-to-voc 300 < voc.freq | grep -v "^'" > ukrainian/voc.txt

The dump used was dated 2025-01-02.

output.txt was generated from voc.txt by running it through the stemmer:

stemwords -l ukrainian -c UTF_8 -i ukrainian/voc.txt -o ukrainian/output.txt

Wikipedia is licensed as: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Loading