Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name, UI, text #1

Open
smsaladi opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Name, UI, text #1

smsaladi opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@smsaladi
Copy link
Owner

smsaladi commented Feb 19, 2020

I’d simplify the text a lot more, just feels like a lot to ask a busy prof to read. I’m thinking something like large bulleted points addressed to editors and researchers like:

For Editors:

Diversify your peer-review, recruit trusted Early Career Reviewers.
Trusted ECRs are endorsed by leading scientists in x different fields.
999 trusted ECRs and counting!
For Researchers:

Endorse a talented ECR in your network
Get on the map by requesting an endorsement from a senior scientist

(Needs some work, just off the top of my head)

And then have a more detailed rationale with graphics on the About page.

I’m terrible with names but TrustedReviewers seems good to me.

@smsaladi
Copy link
Owner Author

I’ll play around with names a bit. I was thinking of playing with reviewers and ecrs (REVIEWEcRs) or something along those lines, but I’m not really sure if that works… TrustedReviewer works too :slight_smile:

@smsaladi
Copy link
Owner Author

  • Regarding the name: “Trusted Reviewers” was what immediately came to my mind, but it may be a bit long. I would maybe not include ECR in the name, because some people are still a bit sceptical about ECRs as peer reviewers.

smsaladi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant