You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’d simplify the text a lot more, just feels like a lot to ask a busy prof to read. I’m thinking something like large bulleted points addressed to editors and researchers like:
For Editors:
Diversify your peer-review, recruit trusted Early Career Reviewers.
Trusted ECRs are endorsed by leading scientists in x different fields.
999 trusted ECRs and counting!
For Researchers:
Endorse a talented ECR in your network
Get on the map by requesting an endorsement from a senior scientist
(Needs some work, just off the top of my head)
And then have a more detailed rationale with graphics on the About page.
I’m terrible with names but TrustedReviewers seems good to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I’ll play around with names a bit. I was thinking of playing with reviewers and ecrs (REVIEWEcRs) or something along those lines, but I’m not really sure if that works… TrustedReviewer works too :slight_smile:
Regarding the name: “Trusted Reviewers” was what immediately came to my mind, but it may be a bit long. I would maybe not include ECR in the name, because some people are still a bit sceptical about ECRs as peer reviewers.
I’d simplify the text a lot more, just feels like a lot to ask a busy prof to read. I’m thinking something like large bulleted points addressed to editors and researchers like:
(Needs some work, just off the top of my head)
And then have a more detailed rationale with graphics on the About page.
I’m terrible with names but TrustedReviewers seems good to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: