ICE is a Python library and trace visualizer for language model programs.
Execution trace visualized in ICE
- Run language model recipes in different modes: humans, human+LM, LM
- Inspect the execution traces in your browser for debugging
- Define and use new language model agents, e.g. chain-of-thought agents
- Run recipes quickly by parallelizing language model calls
- Reuse component recipes such as question-answering, ranking, and verification
ICE requires Python 3.10. If you only have newer or older version(s) of Python installed, we recommend using pyenv to install Python 3.10 and manage multiple Python versions.
If you use Windows, you'll need to run ICE inside of WSL.
-
As part of general good Python practice, consider first creating and activating a virtual environment to avoid installing ICE 'globally'. For example:
python3.10 -m venv venv source venv/bin/activate
-
Install ICE:
pip install ought-ice
-
Set required secrets in
~/.ought-ice/.env
. See.env.example
for the format. -
To learn more, go through the Primer.
-
If you want to make changes to ICE itself, clone the repository, then install it in editable mode:
python3.10 -m venv venv source venv/bin/activate pip install --upgrade pip pip install -e '.[dev]' --config-settings editable_mode=compat pre-commit install npm --prefix ui ci npm --prefix ui run dev
-
If you're working on the backend, you might find it helpful to remove the cache of language model calls:
rm -r ~/.ought-ice/cache
-
pre-commit
complains if your code doesn't pass certain checks. It runs when you commit, and will possibly reject your commit and make you have to fix the problem(s) before you can commit again. (So you should probably use the same commit message you used the first time.)
Note that you don't technically need to run pre-commit install
, but not doing so may cause your commits to fail CI. (Which can be noisy, including by generating commits that will e.g. fix formatting.)
-
Recipes are decompositions of a task into subtasks.
The meaning of a recipe is: If a human executed these steps and did a good job at each workspace in isolation, the overall answer would be good. This decomposition may be informed by what we think ML can do at this point, but the recipe itself (as an abstraction) doesn’t know about specific agents.
-
Agents perform atomic subtasks of predefined shapes, like completion, scoring, or classification.
Agents don't know which recipe is calling them. Agents don’t maintain state between subtasks. Agents generally try to complete all subtasks they're asked to complete (however badly), but some will not have implementations for certain task types.
-
The mode in which a recipe runs is a global setting that can affect every agent call. For instance, whether to use humans or agents. Recipes can also run with certain
RecipeSettings
, which can map a task type to a specificagent_name
, which can modify which agent is used for that specific type of task.
-
Join the ICE Slack channel to collaborate with other people composing language model tasks. You can also use it to ask questions about using ICE.
-
Watch the recording of Ought's Lab Meeting to understand the high-level goals for ICE, how it interacts with Ought's other work, and how it contributes to alignment research.
-
Read the ICE announcement post for another introduction.
ICE is an open-source project by Ought. We're an applied ML lab building the AI research assistant Elicit.
We welcome community contributions:
- If you're a developer, you can dive into the codebase and help us fix bugs, improve code quality and performance, or add new features.
- If you're a language model researcher, you can help us add new agents or improve existing ones, and refine or create new recipes and recipe components.
For larger contributions, make an issue for discussion before submitting a PR.
And for even larger contributions, join us - we're hiring!
If you use ICE, please cite:
Iterated Decomposition: Improving Science Q&A by Supervising Reasoning Processes. Justin Reppert, Ben Rachbach, Charlie George, Luke Stebbing Jungwon Byun, Maggie Appleton, Andreas Stuhlmüller (2023). Ought Technical Report. arXiv:2301.01751 [cs.CL]
Bibtex:
@article{reppert2023iterated,
author = {Justin Reppert and Ben Rachbach and Charlie George and Luke Stebbing and Jungwon Byun and Maggie Appleton and Andreas Stuhlm\"{u}ller},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
eprint = {2301.01751},
primaryClass = {cs.CL},
title = {Iterated Decomposition: Improving Science Q&A by Supervising Reasoning Processes},
year = 2023,
keywords = {language models, decomposition, workflow, debugging},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01751}
}