Skip to content

Conversation

@anedos-chainlink
Copy link
Collaborator

Even on the same branch running go test -shuffle on -v -coverprofile locally can result in coverage diffs :S

We are now sorting the coverprofile file before calculating the diff test coverage which should reduce these deviations

Even on the same branch running `go test -shuffle on -v -coverprofile`
locally can result in coverage diffs :S

We are now sorting the coverprofile file before calculating the diff
test coverage which should reduce these deviations
@anedos-chainlink anedos-chainlink requested review from a team and skudasov as code owners November 27, 2025 19:02
@github-actions
Copy link

👋 anedos-chainlink, thanks for creating this pull request!

To help reviewers, please consider creating future PRs as drafts first. This allows you to self-review and make any final changes before notifying the team.

Once you're ready, you can mark it as "Ready for review" to request feedback. Thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link

Code coverage report:

Package main anedos/better-coverage-report
aggregator 35.86% 44.56%
cmd 0.00% 0.00%
committee 100.00% 100.00%
common 0.00% 0.00%
executor 36.52% 63.96%
indexer 27.90% 24.36%
integration 18.31% 18.88%
protocol 37.74% 51.91%
verifier 62.89% 62.73%

@makramkd
Copy link
Collaborator

makramkd commented Dec 3, 2025

We've simplified coverage reporting to just compare total coverage to a single coverage number in #402. I'll remove the cov compare script since it's no longer needed.

@makramkd makramkd closed this Dec 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants