Fixed to be able to use env of Step#159
Conversation
|
Hi @hnarimiya thanks for the contribution 💯 I'm currently working on a work around for these integration test, will wait on others approval before merging this |
|
What's the status of this? Would be good to get this fix merged :) |
filmaj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It doesn't look like these changes render properly, at least based on the integration tests we ran with these changes. Any idea why?
| @@ -1,13 +1,31 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some of the fields in this payload are not showing up correctly. Attached is a screenshot of the GitHub CI run from #163 (which is a copy of this PR), and how it looks like in our Slack workspace where the message gets posted:
In particular, it seems the following fields do not work as desired from the integration_test_file_payload test from main.yml: env.JOB_STATUS, github.payload.head_commit.url, github.payload.head_commit.author.name, github.payload.head_commit.message.
Any idea why this might be happening?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same seems to happen for us
|
We integrated this fix in #200, will release shortly. |
|
@Darwiner what event tripped the action and what does the file look like? We found in our testing that different events have different shapes and so those details matter. |
This was triggered via a PR open/synchronize, the top of the workflow file being: As for the json file, it goes like this: Additionally, another piece of info that might or might not be relevant is that this is triggered via a composite action. The action in the composite action being: |
|
we have the same problem. the 'fix' didn't the rendering when you use a payload json file. We also see the github env variables rendered with '?' |


Summary
Hello, thanks for this useful software !
I modified the env defined in step to be available in file.
Also, the process of replacing $ was strange, so I fixed it.
In addition, notes on using files were added to the README.
issues: #84
Requirements (place an
xin each[ ])