Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 19, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 12, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change OpenSSF
actions/dependency-review-action action minor v4.6.0 -> v4.7.1 OpenSSF Scorecard

Release Notes

actions/dependency-review-action (actions/dependency-review-action)

v4.7.1

Compare Source

  • Packages added to allow-dependencies-licenses will be allowed even if the package in question has no license information #​889
  • License expressions (e.g. Ruby OR GPL-2.0) in the allow list are automatically discarded so that they don't invalidate the whole allow list, which should just be license identifier (e.g. Ruby)

v4.7.0

Compare Source

  • Handle complex license expressions (e.g. MIT AND GPL-2.0) in allow lists (fixes #​809 and probably others)
  • Replace OTHER in package licenses with LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER so that parsing passes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 12, 2025

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
actions/actions/dependency-review-action da24556b548a50705dd671f47852072ea4c105d9 🟢 7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 2dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Branch-Protection🟢 6branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
SAST🟢 9SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
Vulnerabilities🟢 91 existing vulnerabilities detected

Scanned Files

  • .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.24%. Comparing base (025e932) to head (6877a33).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #106   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.24%   61.24%           
=======================================
  Files          77       77           
  Lines        1548     1548           
  Branches      117      117           
=======================================
  Hits          948      948           
  Misses        582      582           
  Partials       18       18           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/actions-dependency-review-action-4.x branch from c611631 to 6877a33 Compare May 16, 2025 19:50
@renovate renovate bot changed the title ci(github-action): update actions/dependency-review-action action to v4.7.0 ci(github-action): update actions/dependency-review-action action to v4.7.1 May 16, 2025
@skarllot skarllot closed this Jun 19, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants