The MRI results I obtained are significantly lower

[Jinchen2028]

Thank you very much for your work, but after reproducing your code, why did I find that the results are far below the paper's claims? For example, when I used the publicly available dataset from SG-DIP (NEW_KSPACE/Kspace_smap0350.npz), the reconstruction result was only 32.25 dB, whereas SG-DIP achieved 38.26 dB. Is this an issue with the code?

[sjames40]

We think the sg dip will give you more stable result some time while Aseq dip sometime normally will require some fine turning to get the better result and thank you for interest on the paper and for the Ugot dip we will upload the code soon.

thank you
Shijun

[Jinchen2028]

You are very welcome! We really appreciate your interest and patience. We'll notify you as soon as the code is updated.
Thank you again,