Skip to content

syntax issue in migration#1007

Merged
icecrasher321 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
staging
Aug 18, 2025
Merged

syntax issue in migration#1007
icecrasher321 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
staging

Conversation

@icecrasher321
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Attempting to fix memory issue with github runner for large migration.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sim (staging) Building Building Aug 18, 2025 7:59am
1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs Skipped Skipped Aug 18, 2025 7:59am

@icecrasher321 icecrasher321 merged commit 3873f44 into main Aug 18, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Summary

This PR fixes memory issues with GitHub runners during a large data migration by making the migration more resilient to varying database schema states. The primary changes focus on migration file 0076_damp_vector.sql, which appears to be a complex data migration involving workflow logs and user statistics.

The key modifications include:

  1. Added RECURSIVE to CTE: The Common Table Expression (CTE) now uses WITH RECURSIVE candidate AS to properly handle hierarchical traversal of trace spans and their children, which is essential for processing nested execution data.

  2. Switched to JSON-based column access: Instead of direct column references like l.total_cost, the migration now uses (to_jsonb(l)->>'total_cost')::numeric to safely extract values. This prevents failures when columns might not exist in certain schema states.

  3. Implemented JSON existence checks: Rather than direct column checks, the migration uses JSON operators like (to_jsonb(l) ? 'total_tokens') to verify field existence before accessing values.

These changes make the migration more robust across different deployment environments and schema states, particularly important for what appears to be a "one-shot data migration" that needs to be safe on reruns. The migration likely processes large amounts of workflow execution data to populate user statistics, which explains the memory pressure on GitHub runners.

Confidence score: 3/5

  • This PR addresses a specific technical issue but introduces complexity that could impact performance
  • Score reflects the high-risk nature of modifying complex data migrations and potential performance implications
  • Pay close attention to the migration file and thoroughly test with production-sized datasets

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

arenadeveloper02 pushed a commit to arenadeveloper02/p2-sim that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant