WIP: Retry transactions #538
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bogdanpetrea
force-pushed
the
retry-transactions
branch
2 times, most recently
from
216428c to
52bf8c4
Compare
Added some transaction retrying tests.
bogdanpetrea
force-pushed
the
retry-transactions
branch
from
52bf8c4 to
206d4e2
Compare
|
can we expect this to resume? |
|
Hey @auvipy, Except for bug or security fixes, Silver is not being actively developed at the moment. Currently, I am the sole maintainer of this project, meaning unless somebody is going to pick up this feature, it is probably not going to be implemented anytime soon. The requirements/specifications for this feature are also lacking, so contributions in that area would also be required. If anybody is willing to tackle this problem, I am going to assist along the way. |
|
OK, I will look into it to take over. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not too satisfied on how this turned out. Might attempt a rework or close this PR.
Depends on #533