Skip to content

enable using a compiled model #39

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

hahn-kev
Copy link
Collaborator

@hahn-kev hahn-kev commented Apr 16, 2025

compiled models require static access to all converters. In order for this to work it requires some customization of the compiled model, but this does seem to be a valid workaround for issues using a compiled model. See sillsdev/languageforge-lexbox#1609 for the workaround

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved handling of JSON serialization and deserialization for changes, commits, and snapshots, with new static methods for explicit control.
  • Refactor
    • Serialization logic is now conditionally applied based on design-time mode, enhancing flexibility and reliability.
    • Public static methods introduced for serialization and deserialization, providing clearer and more consistent usage.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes refactor JSON serialization and deserialization logic across three entity configuration classes. Serialization and deserialization operations are now delegated to new or updated static methods, each accepting optional JsonSerializerOptions parameters. The configuration logic for handling JSON conversions is made conditional based on whether Entity Framework is running in design-time mode, defaulting to null serializer options in that case. Several methods, previously private, are now public static, and new parameterless constructors or methods are introduced to support these changes. Error handling is also enhanced, particularly for deserialization failures.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/ChangeEntityConfig.cs Added a parameterless constructor; refactored JSON conversion logic to use new static methods; made deserialization method public static with options; introduced a static serialization method; adjusted property configuration for conditional conversion based on design-time mode.
src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/CommitEntityConfig.cs Refactored JSON conversion for CommitMetadata to use new static serialize/deserialize methods with options; added explicit error handling for deserialization; imported SerializationException.
src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/SnapshotEntityConfig.cs Refactored JSON conversion for Entity property to use new static serialize/deserialize methods with options; made deserialization method public static; applied conditional serializer options based on design-time mode.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant EF as Entity Framework
    participant Config as *EntityConfig (Change, Commit, or Snapshot)
    participant Serializer as JsonSerializer

    EF->>Config: Configure(entity, builder)
    Config->>Config: Check if EF.IsDesignTime
    alt Design-time
        Config->>Serializer: Serialize/Deserialize with null options
    else Runtime
        Config->>Serializer: Serialize/Deserialize with provided options
    end
Loading

Poem

🐇
Refactored code, a hop so neat,
Serialization now can't be beat!
Static methods leap in line,
With options checked at design-time.
If errors sprout, exceptions grow—
In harmony, the changes flow!
—A rabbit’s codey rhyme

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Base automatically changed from handle-bulk-adding-changes to main April 18, 2025 04:27
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3145188 and ffc139e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/ChangeEntityConfig.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/CommitEntityConfig.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/SnapshotEntityConfig.cs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/CommitEntityConfig.cs (1)
src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/SnapshotEntityConfig.cs (1)
  • Serialize (44-47)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/CommitEntityConfig.cs (3)

29-31: Added static serialization methods for JSON conversion

The change extracts JSON serialization and deserialization logic into dedicated static methods, which aligns with the approach used in other entity configurations and supports compiled model usage.


37-41: Verify behavior of null handling between conversion and method

There's a discrepancy between the handling of null values:

  • The converter falls back to new() when deserialization returns null
  • The Deserialize method throws an exception when deserialization returns null

Make sure this is intentional, as it could lead to inconsistent behavior depending on how the method is called.


43-46: Method implementation looks good

The static serialization method is correctly implemented, consistent with the pattern established in other entity configurations.

src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/ChangeEntityConfig.cs (4)

9-14: Good pattern for constructor options

The constructor pattern with both a parameterized version and a parameterless version defaulting to JsonSerializerOptions.Default is a good approach to provide flexibility while maintaining backward compatibility.


20-37: Well-implemented conditional serialization based on design time

The conditional property configuration based on EF.IsDesignTime is a good implementation that properly addresses the requirements for supporting compiled models. The approach of holding the property in a variable first and then configuring it conditionally improves code readability.


40-44: Properly implemented method with error handling

The public static method correctly implements deserialization with error handling when JSON conversion fails, making it suitable for both internal and external use.


46-49: Well-structured serialization method

The method is properly implemented, with the appropriate public static modifier to support compiled model requirements.

src/SIL.Harmony/Db/EntityConfig/SnapshotEntityConfig.cs (3)

20-35: Good implementation of conditional serialization

The conditional property configuration based on EF.IsDesignTime is well-structured and consistent with the implementation in ChangeEntityConfig. The approach properly addresses the requirements for supporting compiled models.


38-42: Appropriate method implementation with error handling

The public static method correctly implements deserialization with appropriate error handling, making it suitable for both internal and external use.


44-47: Well-structured serialization method

The serialization method is properly implemented, with appropriate public static modifiers to support compiled model requirements.

m => JsonSerializer.Serialize(m, (JsonSerializerOptions?)null),
json => JsonSerializer.Deserialize<CommitMetadata>(json, (JsonSerializerOptions?)null) ?? new()
m => Serialize(m, null),
json => Deserialize(json, null) ?? new()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding EF.IsDesignTime conditional logic to match other config classes

Other entity configurations (ChangeEntityConfig and SnapshotEntityConfig) conditionally apply serialization options based on whether EF is in design-time mode. This file should follow the same pattern for consistency.

-                m => Serialize(m, null),
-                json => Deserialize(json, null) ?? new()
+                var metadataProperty = builder.Property(c => c.Metadata)
+                    .HasColumnType("jsonb");
+                if (EF.IsDesignTime)
+                {
+                    metadataProperty.HasConversion(
+                        m => Serialize(m, null),
+                        json => Deserialize(json, null) ?? new()
+                    );
+                }
+                else
+                {
+                    metadataProperty.HasConversion(
+                        m => Serialize(m, jsonSerializerOptions),
+                        json => Deserialize(json, jsonSerializerOptions) ?? new()
+                    );
+                }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant