Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
_cli: Add
--certificate-chain
and support--rekor-url
for verification #323_cli: Add
--certificate-chain
and support--rekor-url
for verification #323Changes from 4 commits
2596a2f
88883b3
6ef279e
6c2168b
30ffa26
b3f3847
ce3dc89
da25f55
6074cc2
23e1a26
598e86b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder whether we should warn if a user supplies
--rekor-root-pubkey
but don't set the--rekor-url
. Same with the new--certificate-chain
. At the moment they just get ignored which might be confusing.Same thing when we set
--rekor-url
but don't set--rekor-root-pubkey
. It defaults to therekor.pub
that comes bundled withsigstore-python
(which is almost certainly not what you want when you're using a custom Rekor) instead of warning.Similar issues also exist in the signing code path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it would be good to catch this and flag it as a warning at the minimum (or maybe even an error, since we expect it to fail anyways).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's track this with a follow-up issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is pretty nasty. Not sure if there is a cleaner way to do it.
I believe that the
load_pem...
functions incryptography
load the first valid PEM entry and leave the rest so I don't think they can help us here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this isn't ideal, but it looks like neither
cryptography
norpyOpenSSL
exposes a "load an entire chain from PEMs" API.I think the corresponding OpenSSL API is
SSL_CTX_get0_chain_certs
, so this might be worth a patch to pyOpenSSL in the medium term. But for now, something like this approach is fine 🙂There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like the OpenSSL APIs that accomplish this all work in the context of SSL contexts or connections, so they're probably not a great fit...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NB: I opened pyca/cryptography#7878 to add this API, so we'll be able to use it starting with cryptography 39 (assuming they accept it).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thanks @woodruffw.