Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

assets: bump invalid_inclusion_proof to 0.2 bundle #109

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

woodruffw
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@trailofbits.com>
@woodruffw woodruffw self-assigned this Oct 13, 2023
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@trailofbits.com>
@woodruffw
Copy link
Member Author

Just to copy the rationale here: my understanding of the bundle specification is that (1) inclusion proofs are only required starting with 0.2, and (2) that inclusion proofs in 0.1 bundles aren't required to have checkpoints. Consequently, clients vary in their handling of invalid inclusion proofs in 0.1 bundles: sigstore-python, for example, will perform an online lookup if the checkpoint is missing (as it is here).

@woodruffw woodruffw requested a review from steiza October 13, 2023 15:43
@woodruffw woodruffw marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2023 15:43
Copy link
Member

@steiza steiza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me!

@woodruffw woodruffw enabled auto-merge (squash) October 13, 2023 16:37
@woodruffw woodruffw merged commit 3d2dabb into main Oct 13, 2023
3 checks passed
@woodruffw woodruffw deleted the ww/invalid-inclusion-proof branch October 13, 2023 17:03
This was referenced Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants