Skip to content

Conversation

divagant-martian
Copy link
Contributor

@divagant-martian divagant-martian commented May 22, 2023

Done in different PRs so that they can reviewed independently, as it's likely this won't be merged before I leave

Includes resolution for #4080

divagant-martian and others added 3 commits May 22, 2023 07:07
* update discv5 version in eth2_network_config

* update discv5 version in lighthouse_network

* update lockfile

* update fn update_enr_udp_socket

* update fn update_enr_tcp_port

* update enr_ext

* update boot_node

* fmt?
* update discv5 to use two sockets

* directly start discv5 without inspecting the listening address

* update discv5 to use two sockets

* remove trash file

* fmt

* serialize boot listen sockets
Copy link
Member

@AgeManning AgeManning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me.

I want to just test this against some networks and do a discv5 release before we merge tho. So we have a clean discv5 target.

There was some potentially spicy things in discv5 master at the moment that I want to check still works.

Looking good tho!

@divagant-martian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AgeManning checking with Pawan the doppelganger tests are failing due to an issue with geth and are not related to these changes. Asking for your review again since I changed some stuff around the boot node flags

Copy link
Member

@AgeManning AgeManning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Lets do some testing, a discv5 release and then meeeeeeeerge!

@AgeManning AgeManning added the ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. label Jun 13, 2023
@AgeManning
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2023
Done in different PRs so that they can reviewed independently, as it's likely this won't be merged before I leave

Includes resolution for #4080 
- [ ] #4299
- [ ] #4318
- [ ] #4320 

Co-authored-by: Diva M <divma@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Jun 13, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into unstable.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title Update discv5 to expand ipv6 support [Merged by Bors] - Update discv5 to expand ipv6 support Jun 13, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Jun 13, 2023
ghost pushed a commit to oone-world/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
Done in different PRs so that they can reviewed independently, as it's likely this won't be merged before I leave

Includes resolution for sigp#4080 
- [ ] sigp#4299
- [ ] sigp#4318
- [ ] sigp#4320 

Co-authored-by: Diva M <divma@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com>
Woodpile37 pushed a commit to Woodpile37/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
Done in different PRs so that they can reviewed independently, as it's likely this won't be merged before I leave

Includes resolution for sigp#4080
- [ ] sigp#4299
- [ ] sigp#4318
- [ ] sigp#4320

Co-authored-by: Diva M <divma@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com>
Woodpile37 pushed a commit to Woodpile37/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
Done in different PRs so that they can reviewed independently, as it's likely this won't be merged before I leave

Includes resolution for sigp#4080
- [ ] sigp#4299
- [ ] sigp#4318
- [ ] sigp#4320

Co-authored-by: Diva M <divma@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com>
@AgeManning AgeManning deleted the update-discv5 branch November 25, 2024 21:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Networking ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants