-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NEXT-37313 - api client reauthentication #17
Conversation
1900da8
to
f215b59
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall great work 🦀 👍
d474f78
to
812728c
Compare
812728c
to
7808daa
Compare
I tested this manually by importing a csv-file with 10.000 manufacturers and setting the expires-time of |
7808daa
to
acf9e83
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great that it worked 👍 . I added some smaller suggestions to improve / refactor the implementation a bit further 🙂
b10cc17
to
06b6b48
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 💪
e5cc1d3
to
c9c394e
Compare
c9c394e
to
8709091
Compare
8709091
to
cd72daa
Compare
cd72daa
to
e10f1b2
Compare
Summary of the total line code coverage for the whole codebase
Summary of each file (click to expand)
More details (click to expand)Download full HTML reportYou can download the full HTML report here: click to download You can also generate these reports locallyFor that, you need to install cargo-llvm-cov, then you can run: cargo llvm-cov --all-features --no-fail-fast --open Hint: There are also other ways to see code coverage in Rust. For example with RustRover, you can execute tests with coverage generation directly in the IDE. RememberYour tests should be meaningful and not just be written to raise the coverage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great now 👍 . Sorry for bringing up things while you still worked on it. Maybe we should introduce the same "workflow:development" labels as we have in gitlab 🤷♂️ .
Feel free to merge 😉
No description provided.