Skip to content

Conversation

@mstegmeyer
Copy link
Contributor

@mstegmeyer mstegmeyer commented Aug 14, 2025

for weird reasons, the function from platform does not correctly filter based on the Criteria. In all other use cases, this is not important, because no Criteria is used, but in this case, first() may be a different extension.

No problem, we just do get as the keys are luckily already the Extension.

@mstegmeyer mstegmeyer requested a review from a team August 14, 2025 16:23
@mstegmeyer mstegmeyer self-assigned this Aug 14, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.89%. Comparing base (5eb70fd) to head (a7f58fb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              trunk     #106      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     64.00%   68.89%   +4.88%     
- Complexity        0       66      +66     
============================================
  Files            27       35       +8     
  Lines           714     1064     +350     
  Branches        126      126              
============================================
+ Hits            457      733     +276     
- Misses          228      302      +74     
  Partials         29       29              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

FlorianKe
FlorianKe previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2025
@mstegmeyer mstegmeyer requested review from cyl3x and lernhart August 15, 2025 09:00
lernhart
lernhart previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2025
cyl3x
cyl3x previously approved these changes Aug 18, 2025
En0Ma1259
En0Ma1259 previously approved these changes Aug 18, 2025
@cyl3x
Copy link
Contributor

cyl3x commented Aug 20, 2025

@mstegmeyer can you backport to 6.6?

@mstegmeyer mstegmeyer merged commit b38765a into trunk Aug 21, 2025
6 checks passed
@mstegmeyer mstegmeyer deleted the fix/incorrect-in-app-purchase-detail-result branch August 21, 2025 06:15
mstegmeyer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
* fix: incorrect IAP detail result

* fix: remove debugging

* test: add unit test

* fix: cs

* chore: update composer version

---------

Co-authored-by: Michel <m.bade@shopware.com>
mstegmeyer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
* fix: incorrect IAP detail result

* fix: remove debugging

* test: add unit test

* fix: cs

* chore: update composer version

---------

Co-authored-by: Michel <m.bade@shopware.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants