-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 735
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a test for ls for a single file #784
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #784 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.39% 95.39%
=======================================
Files 33 33
Lines 1239 1239
=======================================
Hits 1182 1182
Misses 57 57 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't change coverage? Maybe the lines were covered by some other test?
All of the code paths were probably covered by the other tests, but not in the combination that the new test does. It's good having this test around because it tests a common use case for |
Fixes #732
Adds a single test to
test/ls.js
that runsls
on a single file, which is not covered by the existing tests.