-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
💥 Bump redis version to 5.0.0 #24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7f1b1ed
💥 Bump redis version to 5.0.0
dawidreedsy 282a37e
Change version to 5.1.0
dawidreedsy ab8252d
Remove changes to node versions in tests
dawidreedsy da7857c
Fix issue with hanging tests
dawidreedsy 51ef0cc
🚨 Fix linter errors
dawidreedsy abc1d92
Add deprecation comment
dawidreedsy File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think technically
.quit()
is only deprecated for Redis server >=7.2:I think I'd read this notice as anyone using Redis server <7.2 should still use
.quit()
, regardless of Node.js client version(?).Not sure how we want to handle this?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the note in the Redis docs:
The
redis-node
code does seem to just close the socket connection. I guess it is the same thing as closing connection to internet.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alecgibson @ericyhwang
This is a breaking change anyway:
Maybe we can just drop support for node-redis < 5.0.0 then we can just use
close
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay turns out
redis@5
doesn't support Redis server <7.2, so I guess it doesn't matter if older server users should still use.quit()
, because those consumers should still be onredis@4
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we shouldn't make this change breaking. It's nice to let people use the older version if possible, especially because it makes the migration path easier to keep the shim around. And since it's super easy for us, I don't see why not.