Remove development planning docs

[ihabadham]

Summary

Remove docs/planning/ directory containing development artifacts from PR #1813 that are no longer needed after merge.

Changes

• Delete docs/planning/DOCS_PR_SUMMARY.md
• Delete docs/planning/DOCUMENTATION_IMPROVEMENT_PLAN.md

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

---

This change is 

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Removed obsolete documentation planning artifacts to streamline the documentation set. No changes to published user guides or tutorials; end-user experience remains unaffected.

• Chores

  • Cleaned up the repository by deleting redundant internal planning documents, reducing clutter and maintenance overhead.
  • No impact on product functionality, features, or APIs.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This PR deletes two documentation planning files under docs/planning, removing non-code artifacts without modifying any code, APIs, or executable logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of Changes
Docs Planning Cleanup docs/planning/DOCS_PR_SUMMARY.md, docs/planning/DOCUMENTATION_IMPROVEMENT_PLAN.md	Removed both planning documents entirely from the repository.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• 📚 Comprehensive documentation improvements for enhanced developer experience #1813 — Introduced these planning documents; this PR removes the same files.

Suggested reviewers

• justin808
• alexeyr-ci2
• Romex91

Poem

I tidied the warren with hop and a glide,
Two scrolls retired, now lighter inside.
No code was nudged, no API stirred—
Just quieter burrows, neat as a word.
Thump-thump! says the rabbit, ears open wide.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "Remove development planning docs" is concise and accurately summarizes the primary change in this PR — deleting the docs/planning directory and its two files (DOCS_PR_SUMMARY.md and DOCUMENTATION_IMPROVEMENT_PLAN.md); it clearly communicates the main intent to reviewers without extra noise.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch remove-planning-docs

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6fdfc08 and 8fa0a9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• docs/planning/DOCS_PR_SUMMARY.md (0 hunks)
• docs/planning/DOCUMENTATION_IMPROVEMENT_PLAN.md (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)

• docs/planning/DOCUMENTATION_IMPROVEMENT_PLAN.md
• docs/planning/DOCS_PR_SUMMARY.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)

• GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (3.2, 20)
• GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (3.4, 22)
• GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (3.4, latest)
• GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (3.4, minimum)
• GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (3.2, minimum)
• GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (3.2, latest)
• GitHub Check: markdown-link-check
• GitHub Check: build

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

• Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
• Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[claude]

🔍 Code Review for PR #1816: Remove development planning docs

✅ Summary

This PR correctly removes temporary planning documents that were created during the documentation improvement effort in PR #1813. The cleanup is appropriate and follows good housekeeping practices.

📊 Review Analysis

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

• Clean removal: Only deletes the intended files without affecting other documentation
• No broken references: These planning docs were internal and not referenced elsewhere
• Proper cleanup: Removes 315 lines of temporary documentation that served its purpose

Potential Issues ✅

• No issues identified: The files being removed are clearly development artifacts
• No dependencies: These planning documents are not linked from any active documentation

Performance Considerations ✅

• Repository cleanliness: Removing 315 lines of temporary documentation reduces repository size
• Maintenance burden: Eliminates potential confusion from outdated planning documents

Security Concerns ✅

• No security implications: The files contain only planning information, no sensitive data

Test Coverage ✅

• Not applicable: Documentation-only change with no code impact

🎯 Recommendations

1. Consider archiving instead of deletion (Optional):

   • While deletion is acceptable, you might want to preserve these planning documents in a wiki or archive branch for historical reference
   • They provide valuable context about the documentation improvement process

2. Future planning documents:

   • Consider using GitHub Issues, Projects, or Discussions for planning to avoid temporary files in the repo
   • Or use a docs/archive/ directory for historical planning documents if they need to be preserved

✨ Positive Aspects

• Clean commit message with proper attribution
• Clear PR description explaining the context
• Appropriate timing after the main documentation PR was merged
• Follows the principle of keeping the repository clean

🚀 Verdict: APPROVED

This is a straightforward and appropriate cleanup PR. The planning documents served their purpose for PR #1813 and can now be safely removed. The changes are clean and don't introduce any issues.

---

Review generated following repository guidelines from CLAUDE.md

[claude]

Code Review: PR #1816 - Remove development planning docs

✅ Overall Assessment

This is a straightforward cleanup PR that removes internal planning documents. The change is appropriate and safe.

📊 Review Summary

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

• Clean removal of development artifacts
• No code changes involved, only documentation cleanup
• Follows good housekeeping practices

Potential Issues ✅

• No issues identified: The deleted files are internal planning documents from PR 📚 Comprehensive documentation improvements for enhanced developer experience #1813
• Files are not referenced elsewhere in the codebase
• No impact on functionality or user-facing documentation

Performance Considerations ✅

• Positive impact: Reduces repository size by removing 315 lines of unnecessary documentation
• No runtime performance implications

Security Concerns ✅

• No security issues: Removing internal planning documents poses no security risk
• No sensitive information exposure

Test Coverage ✅

• Not applicable: This is a documentation-only change
• No code changes that would require testing

🎯 Recommendation

APPROVE - This PR safely removes development planning artifacts that are no longer needed after the documentation improvements from PR #1813 were merged.

💡 Additional Notes

• Good practice to clean up temporary planning documents after implementation
• Keeps the repository focused on production documentation
• The actual documentation improvements from PR 📚 Comprehensive documentation improvements for enhanced developer experience #1813 remain intact

---

Review generated with assistance from Claude Code