-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 377
Update shakapacker to 9.3.2 #688
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Upgrade shakapacker from 9.3.0.beta.2 to 9.3.2 stable release - Update Ruby version from 3.4.6 to 3.4.3 to match environment - Update Gemfile.lock and yarn.lock with new dependencies This upgrade provides the latest stable version of shakapacker with bug fixes and improvements from the beta release. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
🚀 Quick Review App CommandsWelcome! Here are the commands you can use in this PR:
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@justin808 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis PR downgrades the Ruby version from 3.4.6 to 3.4.3 and updates the shakapacker dependency from 9.3.0-beta.2 to 9.3.2 across both Gemfile and package.json. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR Review: Update shakapacker to 9.3.2Overall AssessmentThis is a well-structured dependency upgrade PR with good documentation. The changes are straightforward and low-risk, moving from a beta version to a stable release. Code Quality & Best Practices ✅Strengths:
Concerns:
Potential Bugs & Issues
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Gemfile(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: JS CI
Gemfile
[error] 1-1: Ruby version mismatch: The build uses Ruby 3.4.6 while Gemfile specifies Ruby 3.4.3. This caused bundle install to fail with exit code 18.
[error] 1-1: Command failed: '/opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.4.6/x64/bin/bundle install --jobs 4' exited with code 18 due to Ruby version mismatch.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint CI
Gemfile
[error] 1-1: bundle install failed (exit code 18). Your Ruby version is 3.4.6, but your Gemfile specifies 3.4.3. Command: '/opt/hostedtoolcache/Ruby/3.4.6/x64/bin/bundle install --jobs 4'.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Rspec CI
Gemfile
[error] 1-1: bundle install failed: Ruby version mismatch. Your Ruby version is 3.4.6, but Gemfile specified 3.4.3 (exit code 18).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Gemfile (1)
9-9: Shakapacker version update is correct and synchronized.The gem version has been properly updated from 9.3.0.beta.2 to 9.3.2, matching the npm package update in package.json.
package.json (1)
95-95: Shakapacker npm package update is correct.The dependency has been properly updated from 9.3.0-beta.2 to 9.3.2 and is synchronized with the Gemfile. The move from beta to stable release aligns with the PR objectives.
|
/depoly-review-app |
|
/deploy-review-app |
Update Ruby version back to 3.4.6 to match .ruby-version file and CI configuration, ensuring consistency across all environments. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
🚀 Deploying to Control Plane...⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready... |
🎉 ✨ Deploy Complete! 🚀🌐 ➡️ Open Review AppDeployment successful for PR #688, commit 45d3444 🎮 Control Plane Console |
Pull Request ReviewI've reviewed PR #688 and have the following feedback: Critical Issue: Ruby Version InconsistencyThere is a critical inconsistency with the Ruby version in this PR:
This creates a mismatch where:
Recommended Fix: Option 1 (Recommended): Keep Ruby 3.4.6 (current setting in Gemfile and .ruby-version)
Option 2: Downgrade to Ruby 3.4.3
The PR description mentions updating to 3.4.3 "to match the current environment," but this should be validated against:
Positive AspectsDependency Upgrades:
Lock File Updates:
Testing:
Recommendations
Code Quality AssessmentBest Practices: ✓ Good
Security: ✓ No concerns identified
Performance: ✓ Neutral to positive
Test Coverage:
SummaryThis is a good maintenance PR that moves from beta to stable shakapacker, but it cannot be merged until the Ruby version inconsistency is resolved. Once the Ruby version is consistent across all files, this should be safe to merge after running the full test suite. Please address the Ruby version issue and confirm all tests pass before merging. |
|
✅ Review app for PR #688 was successfully deleted |
Summary
Changes
shakapackergem from9.3.0.beta.2to9.3.2in Gemfileshakapackernpm package from9.3.0-beta.2to9.3.2in package.json3.4.6to3.4.3in GemfileBenefits
This upgrade provides:
Testing
Notes
The Ruby version was updated to 3.4.3 to match the current environment. This should be validated against the deployment environment requirements.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit