You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A lot of the graphs are pretty self-explanatory, but take distributed_fairness, what does that mean?
Is there a glossary of what the default graphs look at? What is considered "good" or "bad?" I understand it's subjective, but a simple "higher number bad" "lower number bad" or that type of general idea would help greatly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For example, here is what you can find about the fairness counters:
Fairness scores are represented in units with relative values, meaning they are evaluated relative to the scores of other hosts. They should not be thought of as having any particular absolute value. Each fairness unit represents an increment of 0.001 in a fairness score. The further the fairness score diverges from 1, the less fair the allocation. Therefore, a fairness score of 990, representing 0.990, is more fair than a fairness score of 1015, which represents 1.015. This is because 1.015 is further from 1 than 0.990.
I'm at a loss here.
A lot of the graphs are pretty self-explanatory, but take
distributed_fairness
, what does that mean?Is there a glossary of what the default graphs look at? What is considered "good" or "bad?" I understand it's subjective, but a simple "higher number bad" "lower number bad" or that type of general idea would help greatly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: