Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document what the different graphs mean #108

Closed
jjasghar opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Document what the different graphs mean #108

jjasghar opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@jjasghar
Copy link

I'm at a loss here.

A lot of the graphs are pretty self-explanatory, but take distributed_fairness, what does that mean?

Is there a glossary of what the default graphs look at? What is considered "good" or "bad?" I understand it's subjective, but a simple "higher number bad" "lower number bad" or that type of general idea would help greatly.

@rschitz
Copy link
Member

rschitz commented Apr 25, 2017

Hi, if you don't know the "advanced" metrics already it's a bit tricky indeed. You need to dig into it.

You can start here: http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-65/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.wssdk.apiref.doc%2Fvim.PerformanceManager.html and here http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-65/index.jsp#com.vmware.wssdk.apiref.doc/vim.host.Summary.QuickStats.html

For example, here is what you can find about the fairness counters:

Fairness scores are represented in units with relative values, meaning they are evaluated relative to the scores of other hosts. They should not be thought of as having any particular absolute value. Each fairness unit represents an increment of 0.001 in a fairness score. The further the fairness score diverges from 1, the less fair the allocation. Therefore, a fairness score of 990, representing 0.990, is more fair than a fairness score of 1015, which represents 1.015. This is because 1.015 is further from 1 than 0.990.

@jjasghar
Copy link
Author

Oh amazing, thanks for the information 💯 🤘

I guess I got some heavy reading todo :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants