Skip to content

Add iOS support #168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2017
Merged

Add iOS support #168

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2017

Conversation

NatalyaKovalova
Copy link
Contributor

@NatalyaKovalova NatalyaKovalova commented Sep 6, 2017

ability to build ipc-channel for iOS platform have been added in this PR.
For building could be used:
cargo build --target aarch64-apple-ios

@larsbergstrom , could you, please, make code review and accept changes?

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Sep 6, 2017

@bors-servo: r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 448a802 has been approved by jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 448a802 with merge 2d622e5...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2017
Add iOS support

ability to build ipc-channel for iOS platform have been added in this PR.
 For building could be used:
  `cargo build  --target aarch64-apple-ios`

@larsbergstrom , could you, please, make code review and accept changes?
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: jdm
Pushing 2d622e5 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 448a802 into servo:master Sep 6, 2017
@antrik
Copy link
Contributor

antrik commented Sep 23, 2017

I wonder, was there any attempt and/or discussion about using the macos back-end on iOS, rather than the inprocess band-aid? Since iOS is based on the same kernel AIUI, it seems to me there might be a good chance that the macos back-end would work here as well...

@larsbergstrom
Copy link
Contributor

@antrik I totally agree! We were just taking a similar approach to the initial Servo Windows port - hack and slash to stand up something that initially works, and then build out additional platform feature support (especially around multiprocess/isolation features) as desired.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants