feat: add Obsession/MethodOrder cop #32
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ferranpm
changed the title
martapower
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @ferranpm, it looks good to me - as long as your pairs agree too.
Cheers!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the goal?
As stated by the Stepdown Rule, code should read from high-level to low-level which is a good practice to make the code more readable and easier to understand.
This PR adds the
Obsession/MethodOrdercop to ensure the methods properly read from top to bottom.Is this a restricting or expanding change?
RESTRICTING change
References
How is it being implemented?
Obsession/MethodOrdercop to RuboCop configuration