Skip to content

docs: add newline to README #102

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2019
Merged

Conversation

thinkingserious
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes

Checklist

  • I have made a material change to the repo (functionality, testing, spelling, grammar)
  • I have read the [Contribution Guide] and my PR follows them.
  • I updated my branch with the master branch.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation about the functionality in the appropriate .md file
  • I have added in line documentation to the code I modified

Short description of what this PR does:

If you have questions, please send an email to Sendgrid, or file a Github Issue in this repository.

@thinkingserious thinkingserious added the status: code review request requesting a community code review or review from Twilio label Oct 1, 2019
@thinkingserious thinkingserious merged commit d71b270 into master Oct 1, 2019
@SendGridDX
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@childish-sambino childish-sambino deleted the thinkingserious-patch-1 branch October 1, 2019 21:25
@childish-sambino childish-sambino changed the title Testing docs: add newline to README Jan 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: code review request requesting a community code review or review from Twilio
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants