Issue 45: implement the stix 21 report type vocabulary

[brett-heffelfinger]

Closes #45

[brett-heffelfinger]

Making a comment to note that I don't think the skos:prefLabels are an appropriate level of description for the subject of the categories and may need revisions.

[uscholdm]

Making a comment to note that I don't think the skos:prefLabels are an appropriate level of description for the subject of the categories and may need revisions.

I don't follow, e.g. the following looks fine to me:

gist:_ReportType_campaign
	a gist:ReportType ;
	skos:definition """STIX 2.1 Description: 
Report subject is a characterization of one or more campaigns and related information."""^^xsd:string ;
	skos:prefLabel "Campaign"^^xsd:string ;
	gist:stixTerm "campaign"^^xsd:string ;
	.

Give an example of your concern.

[brett-heffelfinger]

Give an example of your concern.

I'm thinking along the lines of the distinction of a Campaign itself and a report that's on a Campaign - the IRIs make the distinction for us, but I just think there might be room to make the prefLabel a bit clearer to distinguish the two. It's not really a big issue overall but it's just how I felt while I was writing out the triples.

[uscholdm]

Give an example of your concern.

I'm thinking along the lines of the distinction of a Campaign itself and a report that's on a Campaign - the IRIs make the distinction for us, but I just think there might be room to make the prefLabel a bit clearer to distinguish the two. It's not really a big issue overall but it's just how I felt while I was writing out the triples.

Ah I see. The possible ambiguity should be minimized from context; also labels are meant to be short is possible. Let;s see what @rhohimer thinks.