Skip to content

Issue 46: implement the STIX 2.1 tool type vocabulary #100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

brett-heffelfinger
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #46

@brett-heffelfinger brett-heffelfinger self-assigned this Jun 6, 2025
@brett-heffelfinger brett-heffelfinger linked an issue Jun 6, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@@ -168,6 +168,16 @@ gist:ThreatActorType
rdfs:subClassOf gist:StixCategoryObject ;
.

gist:ToolType
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SHould be in TBox.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we meet sometime next week to talk through the TBox/Cbox issues? More for my understanding before I make any major changes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, we should include @rhohimer

Co-authored-by: Michael Uschold <uscholdm@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement the STIX 2.1 Tool Type vocabulary
2 participants