Skip to content

Style guide updates for local name changes. Fixes #507. #555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 13, 2021

Conversation

rjyounes
Copy link
Collaborator

@rjyounes rjyounes commented Sep 7, 2021

No description provided.

@rjyounes rjyounes requested review from pwin, uscholdm and DanCarey404 and removed request for pwin September 7, 2021 17:25
Copy link
Collaborator

@sa-bpelakh sa-bpelakh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, though I have to say the title casing of Purpose of This Style Guide threw me off for a moment.

@rjyounes
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rjyounes commented Sep 8, 2021

@sa-bpelakh Indeed, I had to check our title case policy to get that right!

@rjyounes rjyounes changed the base branch from develop to release-10.0.0 September 9, 2021 14:03
@rjyounes rjyounes merged commit 1d78df3 into release-10.0.0 Sep 13, 2021
@rjyounes rjyounes deleted the documentation/issue507_style_guide_updates branch September 13, 2021 13:46
|| `isCharacterizedBy`, not `characterizedBy` |
| Prefer an ordinary verb to "hasX" or "isX", even in a pair of inverses | `follows`, not `isPrecededBy`, even when inverse `precedes` exists |
| "At" rather than "on" for datetimes | `isRecordedAt`, not `isRecordedOn`. |
| Present tense only with minimal exceptions when the meaning is inherently in the past | `isRenderedOn`, not `wasRenderedOn`|
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Give an example of a property that is inherently in the past.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry a bit late, just do this some other time, if at all.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea. I'll submit a new PR if you could just review it very quickly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants