fix self-referential text definition of isGovernedBy

[marksem]

I don't like the self-referential text definition of isGovernedBy: "Relates a thing governed to the governor."

Though true, it doesn't really help explain governance. Something like this would seem better to me:

"The subject controls, directs, or strongly influences the actions and conduct of of the object."

[uscholdm]

Here is what ChatGPT had to say:

I don't like the self-referential text definition of isGovernedBy: "Relates a thing governed to the governor." What are some non-circular definitions for an owl objec property called isGovernedBy?

ChatGPT

Creating a non-circular definition for the OWL object property isGovernedBy requires framing it in a way that provides clarity without reusing terms like "governed" or "governor." Below are some options:

1. Descriptive Definition

   "Indicates a relationship where an entity is subject to the authority, rules, or control of another entity."

2. Hierarchical/Authority-Based Definition

   "Defines the connection between a governed entity and the entity or system that exercises control, administration, or regulation over it."

3. Behavioral Definition

   "Specifies the relationship in which one entity establishes or enforces policies, rules, or guidelines that another entity must follow."

4. Jurisdictional Definition

   "Identifies an entity or system responsible for exercising authority or making decisions concerning another entity."

5. Governance-Oriented Definition

   "Denotes the association where one entity provides oversight, rules, or direction to another entity."

Each of these definitions avoids circularity by focusing on the functional or relational aspects of governance, rather than reiterating the terms "governed" or "governor." Let me know if you'd like to refine or expand on these options!

[rjyounes]

@marksem Need to reverse subject and object, something like:

"Relates an entity to another entity that controls, directs, determines, or strongly influences it."

[marksem]

Oops, yes, of course. Sorry, I was actually looking at definitions for governs, so yes, reverse them.