Skip to content

Should Address require containedText? #1128

Closed as not planned
Closed as not planned
@rjyounes

Description

@rjyounes

Current definition of gist:Text:

gist:Text
	a owl:Class ;
	owl:equivalentClass [
		a owl:Class ;
		owl:intersectionOf (
			gist:Content
			[
				a owl:Restriction ;
				owl:onProperty gist:isExpressedIn ;
				owl:someValuesFrom gist:Language ;
			]
			[
				a owl:Restriction ;
				owl:onProperty gist:containedText ;
				owl:someValuesFrom xsd:string ;
			]
		) ;
	] ;
	skos:definition "Content expressed as words and numbers (not graphics)."^^xsd:string ;
	skos:prefLabel "Text"^^xsd:string ;
	.

Currently Address is not a subclass of Text. Should it be? If it must have containedText and be expressed in some language, then it should be.

Or should it require containedText without being a subclass of Text?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions