Skip to content

[WIP][DUMMY] Test a PoC approach to ensure all nodes in the cluster see all as UP as a prerequisite for a topology change and each step of a rolling restart #2975

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[WIP][DUMMY] Test a PoC approach to ensure all nodes in the cluster see all as UP as a prerequisite for a topology change and each step of a rolling restart #2975

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

rzetelskik
Copy link
Member

Description of your changes: sync

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 19, 2025
@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rzetelskik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 19, 2025
@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch 4 times, most recently from 7301533 to 7a60079 Compare September 19, 2025 14:25
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch from 7a60079 to e0ed02a Compare September 22, 2025 08:19
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test images e2e-gke-multi-datacenter-parallel

@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

@rzetelskik: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/unit 7a60079 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-gke-parallel 7a60079 link true /test e2e-gke-parallel
ci/prow/e2e-gke-parallel-clusterip 7a60079 link true /test e2e-gke-parallel-clusterip
ci/prow/e2e-gke-multi-datacenter-parallel e0ed02a link true /test e2e-gke-multi-datacenter-parallel
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

I'll try without rolling restarts

@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test images e2e-gke-multi-datacenter-parallel

@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch from a4c185e to e562b09 Compare September 23, 2025 13:48
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test images e2e-gke-multi-datacenter-parallel

@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch from ce34af0 to 8aedbfb Compare October 6, 2025 18:02
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch from 8aedbfb to 50bc096 Compare October 7, 2025 07:48
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch from 50bc096 to 424ddef Compare October 7, 2025 09:55
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch from 424ddef to 26986ea Compare October 7, 2025 13:44
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@rzetelskik rzetelskik force-pushed the bootstrap-synchronisation-poc branch from 26986ea to 11c84cd Compare October 7, 2025 14:40
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@rzetelskik: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gke-parallel-clusterip 424ddef link true /test e2e-gke-parallel-clusterip
ci/prow/e2e-gke-multi-datacenter-parallel 424ddef link true /test e2e-gke-multi-datacenter-parallel
ci/prow/olm-bundle-openshift-preflight 424ddef link true /test olm-bundle-openshift-preflight
ci/prow/unit 11c84cd link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-gke-parallel 11c84cd link true /test e2e-gke-parallel

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@rzetelskik