-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
Closed
Description
This is what I have done with cell_circles
, I was wondering if I could do the same with cell_boundaries
?
Initially, I more or less did this to create a subset AnnData:
#keep cells that have 10 counts or greater (remove cells that have less than 10 counts)
sc.pp.filter_cells(sdata.tables["table"], min_counts=10)
#keep genes that are in 5 cells or greater (remove genes that are expressed in less than 5 cells)
sc.pp.filter_genes(sdata.tables["table"], min_cells=5)
and then I did this to subset cell_circles
within the sdata
:
sdata_filtered=spatialdata.match_sdata_to_table(sdata=sdata, table_name='table', table=sdata.tables["table"], how='right')
sdata_filtered
SpatialData object
├── Shapes
│ └── 'cell_circles': GeoDataFrame shape: (154472, 2) (2D shapes)
└── Tables
└── 'table': AnnData (154472, 377)
with coordinate systems:
▸ 'global', with elements:
cell_circles (Shapes)
sdata.shapes['cell_circles']=sdata_filtered.shapes['cell_circles']
Now, I was wondering if I could do something similar to this type of subset that was done on cell_circles
, but if I could do it on cell_boundaries
also. I tried match_element_to_table()
, however it did not work, I could post the error if needed, but I suspect that this is known and expected.
I believe this has to do with the dimensions of GeoDataFrame shape
, and how cell_circles
appears to have "something" that cell_boundaries
does not have:
'cell_boundaries': GeoDataFrame shape: (162254, 1) (2D shapes)
'cell_circles': GeoDataFrame shape: (154472, 2) (2D shapes)
Thank you very much in advance.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels