Skip to content

Conversation

@adzhindzhi
Copy link
Contributor

@adzhindzhi adzhindzhi commented Nov 14, 2025

Resolves:

UEPR-399

Changes:

  • Add flag for applying Cat Ears frame to the avatar
  • Pass the flag whenever the Avatar component is used
  • Adjust the styles so that displaying avatars with and without badge does not break the layout

Test Coverage:

  • All test complete successfully

Copy link
Contributor

@KManolov3 KManolov3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Can't wait to see it in action. 🙌

@rosics-code
Copy link

This is not what Scratch is meant to be though? We shouldn't do this as it locks main-site features behind a paywall which is not Scratch's goals.

@Olimon7661
Copy link

This is not what Scratch is meant to be though? We shouldn't do this as it locks main-site features behind a paywall which is not Scratch's goals.

This. Scratch is non-profit and is meant to be free for all, no buts. Sorry, but I don't agree with changing this philosophy at ALL.

@redspacecat
Copy link

I disagree with this as a paywalled status/rank is very clearly rejected by Scratch itself. Please reconsider.

@medlans
Copy link

medlans commented Nov 19, 2025

This is not what Scratch is meant to be though? We shouldn't do this as it locks main-site features behind a paywall which is not Scratch's goals.

Agreed, also donation badges have been rejected too :/

@kiwitwo
Copy link

kiwitwo commented Nov 19, 2025

With all due respect, please at least consider the perspectives of those against this. A lot of people above this post and in this Scratch forum thread have shared their insight and I think it's worth taking a look at. https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/851600/

@mrsrec
Copy link
Contributor

mrsrec commented Nov 19, 2025

It's worth noting I also don't think this is a good idea, but complaining here is just going to get this thread locked.

@pizzawiz
Copy link

I personally don't think this is a good idea, but mrsrec is right. If this ever actually gets implemented, I'll complain then.

@adzhindzhi adzhindzhi changed the base branch from develop to release/membership-program November 20, 2025 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants