feat: add FeatureParameter metadata support

[aljaz823]

Explain your changes

---

Add metadata support for all three types of Feature Parameters:

• FeatureParameterBoolean
• FeatureParameterDate
• FeatureParameterInteger

[scolladon]

Nice addition, thanks !!!

Could the definition be at the top of the file ?
Also, has it been tested manually ?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5562561) to head (7675772).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #915   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           40        40           
  Lines         1083      1083           
  Branches       115       115           
=========================================
  Hits          1083      1083           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[aljaz823]

Nice addition, thanks !!!

Could the definition be at the top of the file ? Also, has it been tested manually ?

Sure, I moved definitions to the top of metadata files.

It has been tested manually, here is the result.

Feature parameters of all three different types:

Generated diff package.xml file:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Package xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
    <types>
        <members>FeatureBoolean1</members>
        <name>FeatureParameterBoolean</name>
    </types>
    <types>
        <members>FeatureDate1</members>
        <name>FeatureParameterDate</name>
    </types>
    <types>
        <members>FeatureSet1</members>
        <members>FeatureSet2</members>
        <name>FeatureParameterInteger</name>
    </types>
    <version>60.0</version>
</Package>

[scolladon]

Thanks for putting the definition on top of the file.
The bottom is reserved to certain types I prefer to be grouped.

Could you add an integration test for those types please ?
You just have to add an item in the list for each new type.
If you struggle with that I can add it, just let me know
As they are regrouped in the same folder I would like to couple the test with the metadata definition, just to fix the spec explicitely

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 7675772 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[aljaz823]

I added the integration tests, though I'm not familiar with that so I just followed the other patterns. Let me know if it needs additional fixing.

[scolladon]

LGTM

Great job, thanks for this contribution

[github-actions]

Shipped in release v5.44.0.
You can install the new version using the version number or the latest-rc channel

$ sfdx plugins:install sfdx-git-delta@latest-rc
$ sfdx plugins:install sfdx-git-delta@v5.44.0

Happy incremental deployment!