Skip to content

Conversation

fm3
Copy link
Member

@fm3 fm3 commented May 20, 2025

URL of deployed dev instance (used for testing):

Steps to test:

  • Create trees with large ids (e.g. via import agglomerate skeleton)
  • Merge two such annotations
  • Resulting tree ids should be compact.

Issues:


@fm3 fm3 self-assigned this May 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 20, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new helper method was added to densify tree IDs in a sequence of trees, ensuring IDs are consecutive and start from 1. The mergeTrees function was updated to apply this densification to both source and target trees before merging, addressing issues with rapidly increasing tree IDs during annotation merges.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.unreleased.md Added a line documenting the bug fix for errors when merging annotations with large tree IDs.
.../tracingstore/tracings/skeleton/TreeUtils.scala Introduced densifyTreeIds (private); updated mergeTrees to densify tree IDs before merging and mapping trees.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Prevent tree IDs from growing too fast when merging annotations with agglomerate skeletons (#8642)
Avoid potential int32 overflow by controlling tree ID growth during repeated merges (#8642)

Poem

In the forest of code where tree IDs grew,
Rabbits hopped in, with a clever new view.
Densifying IDs, keeping numbers in line,
No more runaway growth—now everything’s fine!
With merges now tidy, the bugs hop away,
And the codebase feels lighter, hooray! 🐇🌳✨

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 736c9ef and 839f1cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.unreleased.md (1 hunks)
  • webknossos-tracingstore/app/com/scalableminds/webknossos/tracingstore/tracings/skeleton/TreeUtils.scala (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: backend-tests
  • GitHub Check: build-smoketest-push
  • GitHub Check: frontend-tests
🔇 Additional comments (4)
webknossos-tracingstore/app/com/scalableminds/webknossos/tracingstore/tracings/skeleton/TreeUtils.scala (3)

36-39: Well-implemented densification function

The new densifyTreeIds helper method looks great. It elegantly sorts trees by ID and reassigns consecutive IDs starting from 1, which will ensure compact tree ID ranges after merging. The sorting preserves the relative ordering of trees, maintaining consistent behavior while solving the large ID issue.


45-47: Good application of densification to both tree sets

Applying densification to both source and target trees before merging is an excellent approach. This ensures that regardless of how sparse the original tree IDs might be, they'll be normalized to a compact range before the merge operation occurs, preventing potential issues with very large IDs.


49-56: Complete implementation of the merge logic with densified trees

The merge logic now properly works with the densified tree sets while maintaining the same functional behavior as before. By first densifying the trees and then applying the necessary ID mappings, you've ensured that the resulting merged tree collection will have compact, sequential IDs regardless of how large or sparse the original IDs were.

CHANGELOG.unreleased.md (1)

44-44: Clear and descriptive changelog entry

This changelog entry accurately describes the bug that was fixed and properly links to the PR. It clearly communicates to users that they no longer need to worry about errors when merging annotations with large tree IDs.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@fm3 fm3 marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 09:49
@fm3 fm3 requested a review from philippotto May 20, 2025 09:49
Copy link
Member

@philippotto philippotto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 👍

@fm3 fm3 merged commit 1c737d0 into master May 20, 2025
5 checks passed
@fm3 fm3 deleted the skeleton-merge-densify-tree-ids branch May 20, 2025 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TreeIds grow too fast when merging annotations with agglomerate skeletons
2 participants