Skip to content

Give more meaningful names to GADT type symbols #4083

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2018

Conversation

smarter
Copy link
Member

@smarter smarter commented Mar 8, 2018

Use the name of the corresponding class type parameter instead of _ as
a prefix.

Use the name of the corresponding class type parameter instead of `_` as
a prefix.
@smarter smarter requested a review from odersky March 8, 2018 11:51
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@odersky odersky merged commit 0353e64 into scala:master Mar 9, 2018
@Blaisorblade Blaisorblade deleted the better-gadt-names branch March 9, 2018 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants