You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
See #15697 (comment) and #15697 (comment)
I also think that there's too much blank space in the "Attributes" section, the attribute name could be shown above its value instead of to the left to avoid that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to PR #17232
For the "Attributes" section, it would be a bit the same as in the mobile version, with the name of the attribute above the value? But on two columns in the Desktop version.
Hello, I see that the problem isn't closed. Is it because it's not linked to a PR or because something hasn't been fixed yet?
As far as the width problem for wide screens is concerned, it seems to have been corrected in [issue 17217] (#17217).
For wide screen: 1922x1225
But for 2560x1225(4k):
Proposition:
So If the problem hasn't been solved because it hasn't been corrected for even larger screens.
I know that doing a fix for 4k screens would mean doing a fix for a very, very small proportion of users.
But I can propose a fix by changing the maximum width of #content > div:first-child from 720px to a percentage like 50% :
Note that there are also important readability and accessibility criteria to consider, such as having 9-12 words per line, which take precedence over aesthetic concerns. This is similar to the reasoning behind wide margins in LaTeX—they serve a purpose.
While there probably is room for improvement, we should be cautious when making changes to these aspects, especially since the initial design was crafted by professional graphic designers, I believe.
See #15697 (comment) and #15697 (comment)
I also think that there's too much blank space in the "Attributes" section, the attribute name could be shown above its value instead of to the left to avoid that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: