ignore http4s 0.23.31

[samspills]

• not sure if I have all the correct packages here, is it necessary to ignore everything in the same release?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.76%. Comparing base (c192cd1) to head (61c5376).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3714   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.76%   89.76%           
=======================================
  Files         174      174           
  Lines        5049     5049           
  Branches      493      493           
=======================================
  Hits         4532     4532           
  Misses        517      517           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[rossabaker]

Only http4s-dsl-0.23.31 is bad, but I don't know what ignoring just that one does when these all come from the same repository.

[rossabaker]

I think this is bigger than it needs to be, but I am confident it does the right thing and I don't understand the full ramifications of calling out just the http4s-dsl, so, 👍.

[mzuehlke]

I think this is bigger than it needs to be, but I am confident it does the right thing and I don't understand the full ramifications of calling out just the http4s-dsl, so, 👍.

I think if you define the versions individually like:

val http4s = Seq(
  "org.http4s" %% "http4s-blaze-server" % "0.21.0-M6",
  "org.http4s" %% "http4s-circe"        % "0.21.0-M6",
  "org.http4s" %% "http4s-dsl"          % "0.21.0-M6",
  "io.circe"   %% "circe-derivation"    % "0.12.0-M7" % Compile,
  "io.circe"   %% "circe-fs2"           % "0.12.0"
)

and we would only ignore http4s-dsl, Steward would update the other artifacts.

[rossabaker]

We probably would have been fine as long as nothing pulled in something that depends on http4s-dsl (i.e., http4s-core would have been fine.). But this requires is less thinking, and it was superseded within a day, so I think we did the right thing here.