Skip to content

Conversation

fthomas
Copy link
Member

@fthomas fthomas commented Feb 6, 2024

@fthomas fthomas added this to the 0.30.0 milestone Feb 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0631204) 91.19% compared to head (cd1af10) 91.19%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3282   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.19%   91.19%           
=======================================
  Files         167      167           
  Lines        3408     3408           
  Branches      304      304           
=======================================
  Hits         3108     3108           
  Misses        300      300           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fthomas fthomas added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 6, 2024
@fthomas fthomas merged commit 1f8ea30 into main Feb 6, 2024
@fthomas fthomas deleted the topic/increase-default-max-buffer-size branch February 6, 2024 21:05
@clairemcginty
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @fthomas, would you be open to bumping this value again? (I can create a PR.) it looks like low buffer size has been a blocker for a repo in my org, Scio, to receive updates, but I'm able to run it locally with a --max-buffer-size of 49152.

@mzuehlke
Copy link
Member

mzuehlke commented Sep 4, 2025

Please do so 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants