-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 641
Open
Description
As per Burcin, with the option of the algorithm
keyword for _evalf_
in #12289,
ATM, if you implement different backends, you need to write a lot of
boilerplate code in _evalf_() to parse the algorithm argument, do the
right thing if it is not given etc. Can we have a default _evalf_
method, which dispatches to _evalf_<system>_ methods if they exist and
raise error if not? Perhaps we can also figure out how to annotate
these methods to indicate if they support arbitrary precision
evaluation or not.
Component: symbolics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15200