Skip to content

upki: tweak high-level library API surface#56

Merged
djc merged 6 commits intomainfrom
tweak-cli
Feb 3, 2026
Merged

upki: tweak high-level library API surface#56
djc merged 6 commits intomainfrom
tweak-cli

Conversation

@djc
Copy link
Member

@djc djc commented Feb 2, 2026

No description provided.

@djc djc requested a review from ctz February 2, 2026 12:55
@djc djc requested a review from ctz February 2, 2026 14:03
@djc djc force-pushed the tweak-cli branch 2 times, most recently from b3bdd4e to 6ead226 Compare February 2, 2026 14:06
@djc
Copy link
Member Author

djc commented Feb 2, 2026

(Would like another round of review here, for test removal and further CLI tweaks.)

Comment on lines -117 to +118
.arg("revocation-check")
.arg("high")
.arg("revocation")
.arg("check")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Theoretically this could be flattened back to revocation-check? Depends if we expect to have other things under revocation which would be siblings of check?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah -- given that revocation check is the same number of characters to type, I think the added modularity is a nice win even if we don't end up needing it.

I'm wondering if we should move fetch and/or verify into revocation...

@djc djc added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 3, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2852a81 Feb 3, 2026
7 checks passed
@djc djc deleted the tweak-cli branch February 3, 2026 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants