You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
certified key selection not working in all cases #236
The certified key selection implemented by rustls_client_hello_select_certified_key() currently does not take the limitations of the later defined rustls_connection into account. This leads to handshake failures.
Assuming you have a server with 2 certified keys: P-384 and RSA.
The rustls_server_config has:
TLS 1.2 and 1.3 enabled
All 1.3 ciphers and only the RSA 1.2 ciphers
A client connecting with TLS 1.2, the rustls_client_hello_select_certified_key() will chose the P-384 certified key (since the client has the necessary ciphers), create the rustls_connection, start the handshake and fail. The connection simply is unable to do RSA with the P-384 certified key.
The fix would be for rustls_client_hello_select_certified_key() to take the server ciphers into account as well. This is a bit awkward, since the certified key needs to be selected before the rustls_connection for the handshake is created.
At the moment, this is a rare scenario. But selecting the certified key on incomplete understanding of the TLS properties involved, could lead to more common failures in the future. When a new rustls version is released and disables ciphers or particular combinations of them.
Supporting multiple certified keys in a server was helpful in the introduction of EC. The continued support of such a feature via rustls_client_hello_select_certified_key() carries good intentions, however this case shows that it is incomplete.
I guess, either certified key selection is implemented deep inside the rustls handshake itself or it needs to be abandoned.
Opinions?
PS. minor detail: the error of such a failure gives [7107] peer is incompatible: reason omitted. Where does this reason omitted come from? In the rustls code I see only cases of this error with descriptions.
Activity