Skip to content

Conversation

@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU commented Apr 1, 2024

The current section is confusing even to some t-types members, and also generally I have spoken to a large amount of people who did not understand how ParamEnv worked at all even after reading the current section on it.

Solution: rewrite it xd

Would quite like to find someone who currently doesnt understand ParamEnv and get them to read through this with me so I can figure out if it is actually more helpful and what problems crop up in trying to understand this ✨

Also change the location of the chapter to be before most of the chapters on analysis as an understanding of what a ParamEnv is, is pretty useful in understanding trait solving and whatnot

cc @compiler-errors

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I'll definitely review this tomorrow, please annoy me if I forget!

src/param_env.md Outdated
Comment on lines 45 to 47
// Trying to prove `T: Clone` with a `ParamEnv` of `[T: Sized]` will
// fail as there is nothing in the environment telling the trait solver
// that `T` implements `Clone`.
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease Apr 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this should clarified. If we can't find anything in the ParamEnv there may still be other candidates like user-written impls. Might sound a bit nit-picky but I think mentioning this could fortify the reader's understanding. Of course, there's no such thing as impl<T> Clone for T { … } but we might want mention that somehow.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no no this is perfect thank you for pointing this out. I remember vaguely thinking of this when writing but it must have slipped my mind thanks <3 I definitely dont want to give the impression that the only way of proving things is via the bounds in ParamEnv

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i was partly through leaving some reviews when fmease came thru, some of these may be not relevant anymore but im putting them up so they dont bitrot (e.g. if lcnr also reviews tomorrow while i am asleep haha)

src/param_env.md Outdated
## What is it

[pe]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/ty/struct.ParamEnv.html
The type system relies on information in the environment in order for it to function correctly. This information is stored in the [`ParamEnv`][pe] type and it is important to use the correct `ParamEnv` when interacting with the type system.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we be more clear abt what an "environment" means here before diving into the details?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps though I don't actually know how to do that. I'm kind of using environment here as a handwavey vibes based thing because I can't put into words what I mean concretely 😅

src/param_env.md Outdated
The type system relies on information in the environment in order for it to function correctly. This information is stored in the [`ParamEnv`][pe] type and it is important to use the correct `ParamEnv` when interacting with the type system.

For example if you have a function
The information represented by `ParamEnv` is a list of in scope where clauses, and a [`Reveal`][reveal]. A `ParamEnv` typically corresponds to a specific item's environment however it can also be created with arbitrary data that is not derived from a specific item. In most cases `ParamEnv`s are initially created via the [`param_env` query][query] which returns a `ParamEnv` derived from the provided item's where clauses.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we explain what a Reveal is too?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the existing doc comments on Reveal do an adequate job of describing what the purpose of Reveal is. I added a note explicitly instructing people to click on the link if they want information.

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(some other random comments when i was reading from the bottom up, will review the middle parts tomorrow 😸)

src/param_env.md Outdated

When needing a `ParamEnv` in the compiler there generally three options for obtaining one:
- The correct env is already in scope simply use it (or pass it down the call stack to where you are)
- Call `tcx.param_env(def_id)`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(or param_env_reveal_all_normalized -- maybe worth mentioning and explaining why that may be desired)

Also are we forgetting ParamEnv::reveal_all()? 🤔 Useful for monomorphization usages

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated this section to talk about how to acquire ParamEnvs with Reveal::All and when this is desired.

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As someone who is :ferrisClueless: about typeck and ParamEnv, this looks great to me and is a very clear explanation on what ParamEnv is / what it's used for. Pointing out the pitfalls is also very 😎.

src/param_env.md Outdated
```

[query]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_ty_utils/ty/fn.param_env.html
It's very important to use the correct `ParamEnv` when interacting with the type system as otherwise it can lead to ICEs or things compiling when they shouldn't (or vice versa). See [#82159](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82159) and [#82067](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82067) as examples of PRs that changed rustc to use the correct param env to avoid ICE.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be useful pointing out what is the correct ParamEnv here. I understand it might be very difficult to come up with clear guidance, if so, ignore this comment :3

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do this to some degree in the 3rd subchapter which is hopefully enough. It is pretty difficult to give general guidance here yeah 😅 hopefully what we have now is adequate

src/param_env.md Outdated
`[T: Sized, T: Copy, T: Clone, T: Trait, T: SuperTrait, T: SuperSuperTrait]`
This allows us to prove `T: Clone` and `T: SuperSuperTrait` when type checking `bar`.

The `Clone` trait has a `Sized` supertrait however we do not end up with two `T: Sized` bounds in the env (one for the supertrait and one for the implicitly added `T: Sized` bound). This is because the elaboration process (implemented via [`util::elaborate`][elaborate]) deduplicates the where clauses to avoid this.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The links can be very helpful 👍

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU merged commit 84bbfc3 into rust-lang:master Apr 1, 2024
@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member Author

BoxyUwU commented Apr 1, 2024

big thanks to all of you for the reviews it was invaluable <3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants