not need Option for dbg_scope
#96432
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @davidtwco (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
davidtwco
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2022
|
This seems reasonable to me, I'm not particularly familiar with this code but the changes here seem to just be a refactoring that won't affect the output. @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 843e8d1 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2022
not need `Option` for `dbg_scope` This PR fixes a few FIXME about not using `Option` in `dbg_scope` field of `DebugScope`, during `create_function_debug_context` func in codegen parts. Added a `BitSet<SourceScope>` parameter to `make_mir_scope` to indicate whether the `DebugScope` has been instantiated. cc `@eddyb`
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2022
not need `Option` for `dbg_scope` This PR fixes a few FIXME about not using `Option` in `dbg_scope` field of `DebugScope`, during `create_function_debug_context` func in codegen parts. Added a `BitSet<SourceScope>` parameter to `make_mir_scope` to indicate whether the `DebugScope` has been instantiated. cc ``@eddyb``
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2022
not need `Option` for `dbg_scope` This PR fixes a few FIXME about not using `Option` in `dbg_scope` field of `DebugScope`, during `create_function_debug_context` func in codegen parts. Added a `BitSet<SourceScope>` parameter to `make_mir_scope` to indicate whether the `DebugScope` has been instantiated. cc ```@eddyb```
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#96377 (make `fn() -> _ { .. }` suggestion MachineApplicable) - rust-lang#96397 (Make EncodeWide implement FusedIterator) - rust-lang#96421 (Less `NoDelim`) - rust-lang#96432 (not need `Option` for `dbg_scope`) - rust-lang#96466 (Better error messages when collecting into `[T; n]`) - rust-lang#96471 (replace let else with `?`) - rust-lang#96483 (Add missing `target_feature` to the list of well known cfg names) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a few FIXME about not using
Optionindbg_scopefield ofDebugScope, duringcreate_function_debug_contextfunc in codegen parts.Added a
BitSet<SourceScope>parameter tomake_mir_scopeto indicate whether theDebugScopehas been instantiated.cc @eddyb