Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More let_else adoptions #93590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022
Merged

More let_else adoptions #93590

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022

Conversation

est31
Copy link
Member

@est31 est31 commented Feb 2, 2022

Continuation of #89933, #91018, #91481, #93046.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 2, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @lcnr

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2022
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Feb 2, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

after seeing let_else a lot more, I have to admit i still think it's somewhat difficult to read, even after using it myself.
It definitely improves the general readability of the code and i can't really think of any sensible alternative though 😅

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 2, 2022

📌 Commit 670f5c6 has been approved by lcnr

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 2, 2022
@@ -217,85 +217,81 @@ where
let mut issue_num = None;
let mut is_soft = false;
for meta in metas {
if let Some(mi) = meta.meta_item() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code is being refactored in #93017. Does c271373db4a58920c2a9629cebaab321b3e2ca57 need to use more let-else?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It still has a diverging block in the else case, so your refactored code can still benefit from let else adoption. But I can remove it here so that it doesn't cause conflicts. Does that sound like a plan to you?

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92528 (Make `Fingerprint::combine_commutative` associative)
 - rust-lang#93221 ([borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns)
 - rust-lang#93542 (Prevent lifetime elision in type alias)
 - rust-lang#93546 (Validate that values in switch int terminator are unique)
 - rust-lang#93571 (better suggestion for duplicated `where` clause)
 - rust-lang#93574 (don't suggest adding `let` due to bad assignment expressions inside of `while` loop)
 - rust-lang#93590 (More let_else adoptions)
 - rust-lang#93592 (Remove unused dep from rustc_arena)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3388e6d into rust-lang:master Feb 2, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 2, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
Adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This is the biggest of these PRs and handles the changes outside of rustdoc, rustc_typeck, rustc_const_eval, rustc_trait_selection, which were handled in PRs rust-lang#94139, rust-lang#94142, rust-lang#94143, rust-lang#94144.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
rustc_typeck: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_typeck.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
Adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This is the biggest of these PRs and handles the changes outside of rustdoc, rustc_typeck, rustc_const_eval, rustc_trait_selection, which were handled in PRs rust-lang#94139, rust-lang#94142, rust-lang#94143, rust-lang#94144.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
rustc_const_eval: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_const_eval.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2022
…jgillot

rustc_trait_selection: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_trait_selection.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2022
…illot

rustc_trait_selection: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_trait_selection.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
librustdoc: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles librustdoc.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants