Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix debuginfo tests for the latest version of the Windows SDK. #88842

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2021
Merged

Fix debuginfo tests for the latest version of the Windows SDK. #88842

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2021

Conversation

wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Re-enable the tests that were disabled to fix CI.

Changes:

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 11, 2021
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

wesleywiser commented Sep 11, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Note: the i686-pc-windows-msvc target's cdb has had issues correctly visualizing enums in the past. I'm trying it again to see if the update fixes those issues but there is a chance this will fail in CI.

@bors rollup=iffy

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@wesleywiser wesleywiser mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2021
Closed
@wesleywiser
Fix debuginfo tests for the latest version of the Windows SDK.
e156df2 
- Cdb now correctly visualizes enums.
- Cdb doesn't render emoji characters in `OSStr` anymore.
- Cdb doesn't always render `str` correctly (rust-lang#88840)
@apiraino apiraino added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 13, 2021
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

Thanks for fixing this, @wesleywiser!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 15, 2021

📌 Commit e156df2 has been approved by michaelwoerister

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 15, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 15, 2021

⌛ Testing commit e156df2 with merge c950f7fd4793cc466326a5e1856d3e6337ddbb66...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 15, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 15, 2021
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

michaelwoerister commented Sep 15, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Looks like a spurious error:

curl: (6) Could not resolve host: ci-mirrors.rust-lang.org

https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/runs/3608424333#step:15:33

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 15, 2021
@michaelwoerister michaelwoerister added the A-spurious Area: Spurious failures in builds (spuriously == for no apparent reason) label Sep 15, 2021
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Sep 16, 2021

@wesleywiser FYI, I needed to disable src/test/debuginfo/mutex.rs in #88977 because the version of CDB updated to 10.0.22000.1 this morning, and the output changed in ways that I wasn't comfortable updating. Beyond the : 0 output differences, there were various [<Raw View>] strings and other stuff that I wasn't familiar with.

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

@ehuss Thanks for the heads up! I'll take a look at that as well.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2021

⌛ Testing commit e156df2 with merge e71925a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: michaelwoerister
Pushing e71925a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 20, 2021
@bors bors merged commit e71925a into rust-lang:master Sep 20, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Sep 20, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e71925a): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@michaelwoerister michaelwoerister

Labels
A-spurious Area: Spurious failures in builds (spuriously == for no apparent reason) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.57.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
10 participants
@wesleywiser @rust-highfive @rust-log-analyzer @michaelwoerister @bors @ehuss @rust-timer @Mark-Simulacrum @apiraino @rustbot