Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @oli-obk (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
oli-obk
reviewed
Jan 28, 2021
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
oli-obk
reviewed
Jan 28, 2021
Contributor
|
@bors r+ squash |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 85ad773 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2021
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#79023 (Add `core::stream::Stream`) - rust-lang#80562 (Consider Scalar to be a bool only if its unsigned) - rust-lang#80886 (Stabilize raw ref macros) - rust-lang#80959 (Stabilize `unsigned_abs`) - rust-lang#81291 (Support FRU pattern with `[feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]`) - rust-lang#81409 (Slight simplification of chars().count()) - rust-lang#81468 (cfg(version): treat nightlies as complete) - rust-lang#81473 (Warn write-only fields) - rust-lang#81495 (rustdoc: Remove unnecessary optional) - rust-lang#81499 (Updated Vec::splice documentation) - rust-lang#81501 (update rustfmt to v1.4.34) - rust-lang#81505 (`fn cold_path` doesn't need to be pub) - rust-lang#81512 (Add missing variants in match binding) - rust-lang#81515 (Fix typo in pat.rs) - rust-lang#81519 (Don't print error output from rustup when detecting default build triple) - rust-lang#81520 (Don't clone LLVM submodule when download-ci-llvm is set) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2021
Consider auto derefs before warning about write only fields Changes from rust-lang#81473 extended the dead code lint with an ability to detect fields that are written to but never read from. The implementation skips over fields on the left hand side of an assignment, without marking them as live. A field access might involve an automatic dereference and de-facto read the field. Conservatively mark expressions with deref adjustments as live to avoid generating false positive warnings. Closes rust-lang#81626.
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2021
Consider auto derefs before warning about write only fields Changes from rust-lang#81473 extended the dead code lint with an ability to detect fields that are written to but never read from. The implementation skips over fields on the left hand side of an assignment, without marking them as live. A field access might involve an automatic dereference and de-facto read the field. Conservatively mark expressions with deref adjustments as live to avoid generating false positive warnings. Closes rust-lang#81626.
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2021
Consider auto derefs before warning about write only fields Changes from rust-lang#81473 extended the dead code lint with an ability to detect fields that are written to but never read from. The implementation skips over fields on the left hand side of an assignment, without marking them as live. A field access might involve an automatic dereference and de-facto read the field. Conservatively mark expressions with deref adjustments as live to avoid generating false positive warnings. Closes rust-lang#81626.
Contributor
|
We discussed this PR in the compiler triage meeting. In short #81473 injected some issues, namely #81626 and #81658, that have leaked into the beta release.
We decided in the compiler triage meeting to revert #81473 on the 1.51 beta branch. We'll leave it in place on nightly 1.52 branch, since we expect #81658 will be resolved before the nightly-to-beta-1.52 promotion. I'll be posting a revert PR shortly. |
This was referenced Mar 15, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2021
…-fields, r=Mark-Simulacrum Revert PR 81473 to resolve (on beta) issues 81626 and 81658. Revert PR rust-lang#81473 to resolve (on beta) issues rust-lang#81626 and rust-lang#81658. Revert "Add missing brace" This reverts commit 85ad773. Revert "Simplify base_expr" This reverts commit 899aae4. Revert "Warn write-only fields" This reverts commit d3c69a4.
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2025
…, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang#87129 to address rust-lang#75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang#81473's "write-only fields" detection - rust-lang#81473 was reverted via rust-lang#86212 and rust-lang#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2025
…, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang#87129 to address rust-lang#75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang#81473's "write-only fields" detection - rust-lang#81473 was reverted via rust-lang#86212 and rust-lang#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2025
…, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang#87129 to address rust-lang#75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang#81473's "write-only fields" detection - rust-lang#81473 was reverted via rust-lang#86212 and rust-lang#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2025
…, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang#87129 to address rust-lang#75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang#81473's "write-only fields" detection - rust-lang#81473 was reverted via rust-lang#86212 and rust-lang#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2025
…, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang#87129 to address rust-lang#75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang#81473's "write-only fields" detection - rust-lang#81473 was reverted via rust-lang#86212 and rust-lang#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2025
…, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang#87129 to address rust-lang#75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang#81473's "write-only fields" detection - rust-lang#81473 was reverted via rust-lang#86212 and rust-lang#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2025
…, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang#87129 to address rust-lang#75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang#81473's "write-only fields" detection - rust-lang#81473 was reverted via rust-lang#86212 and rust-lang#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang#81626, rust-lang#81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2025
Rollup merge of #145214 - notJoon:fix/enable-self-assignment, r=petrochenkov fix: re-enable self-assignment ## Description Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`. ## History The original regressions (#81626, #81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand. - Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in #87129 to address #75356 - The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of #81473's "write-only fields" detection - #81473 was reverted via #86212 and #83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (#81626, #81658) - The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis. ## Changes - Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file - `handle_assign` and - `check_for_self_assign` - Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods - Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cc @Boscop's example in #49256.