Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix lonely backtick #65113

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2019
Merged

Fix lonely backtick #65113

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2019

Conversation

Qwaz
Copy link
Contributor

@Qwaz Qwaz commented Oct 4, 2019

That backtick won't be sad anymore

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @eddyb (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 4, 2019
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

r? @jonas-schievink @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2019

📌 Commit d152d48 has been approved by jonas-schievink

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 4, 2019
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2019
Fix lonely backtick

That backtick won't be sad anymore
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2019
Fix lonely backtick

That backtick won't be sad anymore
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2019
Rollup of 18 pull requests

This contains changes from all the successful runs that bors marked as timed out, plus a revert of #63649 which appears to be the immediate cause of the timeouts.

Successful merges:

 - #64708 (Stabilize `Option::as_deref` and `Option::as_deref_mut`)
 - #64728 (Stabilize UdpSocket::peer_addr)
 - #64765 (std: Reduce checks for `feature = "backtrace"`)
 - #64909 (When encountering chained operators use heuristics to recover from bad turbofish)
 - #65011 (Do not ICE when dereferencing non-Copy raw pointer)
 - #65064 (permit asyncawait-ondeck to be added by anyone)
 - #65066 ([const-prop] Fix ICE when trying to eval polymorphic promoted MIR)
 - #65100 (Replace GeneratorSubsts with SubstsRef)
 - #65105 (Split out some passes from librustc)
 - #65106 (Allow unused attributes to avoid incremental bug)
 - #65113 (Fix lonely backtick)
 - #65116 (Remove unneeded visit_statement definition)
 - #65118 (Update the documented default of -Z mutable-noalias)
 - #65123 (Account for macro invocation in `let mut $pat` diagnostic.)
 - #65124 (Replace some instances of `as *[const | mut] _` with `.cast()`)
 - #65126 (Fix typo on `now()` comments)
 - #65130 (lint: extern non-exhaustive types are improper)
 - #65151 (Revert #63649 - "Upgrade Emscripten targets to use upstream LLVM backend")

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit d152d48 into rust-lang:master Oct 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants