- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
Use more fine grained locks for the dep graph #63756
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
  File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment below is great -- but it'd be good to document just a bit more (this is pre-existing, as the code wasn't all that thoroughlly commented before =)
I'd say something like:
Encodes the rustc dependency graph. The nodes are identified by an index (
DepNodeIndex); the data for each node is stored in itsDepNodeData, found in thedatafield.We never remove nodes from the graph: they are only added. Most of the time, the node is mapped 1-to-1 with some
DepNode, which basically identifies a query. When such nodes are allocated, we add theDepNodinto thenode_to_node_indexmap and allocate a fresh node index.This struct uses two locks internally: the
dataandnode_to_node_indexfield are locked separately. Operations that begin with aDepNodeIndextypically just access the data field.The only operation that must manipulate both fields is adding new nodes, in which case we first acquire the
node_to_node_indexlock and then, once a new node is to be inserted, acquire the lock ondata.(We also have a field fields that use atomics: these are simple counters that are used for profiling and debugging and are not used with
debug_assertions.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added that, but removed the incorrect parts =P