Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply #[must_use] lint to components of tuples #61100

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 3, 2019

Conversation

varkor
Copy link
Member

@varkor varkor commented May 23, 2019

Fixes #61061.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @michaelwoerister

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 23, 2019
@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented May 23, 2019

@bors try (for crater run)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 23, 2019

⌛ Trying commit 4a5e4efe85075bbb7347a09f77515d89f4df5514 with merge 49ae6b765de90f324a1eb52a6884406f2543815f...

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 23, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 23, 2019
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented May 24, 2019

@TimNN: the above error message cut off the important part.

@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented May 24, 2019

@bors try

(I tested this before, but one of the compiler internal lints failed.)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 24, 2019

⌛ Trying commit 68c0ced with merge 58b2112...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2019
Apply #[must_use] lint to components of tuples

Fixes #61061.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 24, 2019

☀️ Try build successful - checks-travis
Build commit: 58b2112

@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented May 24, 2019

@craterbot run mode=check-only

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

👌 Experiment pr-61100 created and queued.
🤖 Automatically detected try build 58b2112
🔍 You can check out the queue and this experiment's details.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 24, 2019
@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚧 Experiment pr-61100 is now running on agent aws-3-tmp.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 Experiment pr-61100 is completed!
📊 2 regressed and 0 fixed (60951 total)
📰 Open the full report.

⚠️ If you notice any spurious failure please add them to the blacklist!
ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. labels May 26, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented May 27, 2019

That's a rather small amount of regressions... Possibly too few?
...This seems bad in terms of justifying adding the lint to (t0, .., tn)?

On the other hand, the supporting code is small... thoughts?

@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented May 27, 2019

On the other hand, the supporting code is small... thoughts?

I think this change is small enough that there's not much reason to prefer not to add it if it helps catch a few more mistakes. There aren't going to be any additional false positives either.

@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented May 27, 2019

A warning is produced for each #[must_use] component of a tuple now, pointing to the correct span.

r? @cramertj

@cramertj
Copy link
Member

cramertj commented Jun 3, 2019

r=me with missing test. Thanks so much for doing this! :)

@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented Jun 3, 2019

@bors r=cramertj

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2019

📌 Commit de2bf3a has been approved by cramertj

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 3, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2019

⌛ Testing commit de2bf3a with merge 6ffb8f5...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019
Apply #[must_use] lint to components of tuples

Fixes #61061.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: cramertj
Pushing 6ffb8f5 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 3, 2019
@bors bors merged commit de2bf3a into rust-lang:master Jun 3, 2019
@varkor varkor deleted the must_use-tuple-expr branch June 3, 2019 22:09
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

scottmcm commented Jun 3, 2019

This seems bad in terms of justifying adding the lint

I don't think crater should necessarily be expected to find lint warnings, @Centril, because it's code that theoretically works. It can't tell use whether someone wrote the code wrong, had to debug to find it, fixed it, and then uploaded to crates.io once it worked.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2019
Extend `#[must_use]` to nested structures

Extends the `#[must_use]` lint to apply when `#[must_use]` types are nested within `struct`s (or one-variant `enum`s), making the lint much more generally useful. This is in line with #61100 extending the lint to tuples.

Fixes #39524.

cc @rust-lang/lang and @rust-lang/compiler for discussion in case this is a controversial change. In particular, we might want to consider allowing annotations on fields containing `#[must_use]` types in user-defined types (e.g. `#[allow(unused_must_use)]`) to opt out of this behaviour, if there are cases where we this this is likely to have frequent false positives.

(This is based on top of #62235.)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2019
Extend `#[must_use]` to nested structures

Extends the `#[must_use]` lint to apply when `#[must_use]` types are nested within `struct`s (or one-variant `enum`s), making the lint much more generally useful. This is in line with #61100 extending the lint to tuples.

Fixes #39524.

cc @rust-lang/lang and @rust-lang/compiler for discussion in case this is a controversial change. In particular, we might want to consider allowing annotations on fields containing `#[must_use]` types in user-defined types (e.g. `#[allow(unused_must_use)]`) to opt out of this behaviour, if there are cases where we this this is likely to have frequent false positives.

(This is based on top of #62235.)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2019
Extend `#[must_use]` to nested structures

Extends the `#[must_use]` lint to apply when `#[must_use]` types are nested within `struct`s (or one-variant `enum`s), making the lint much more generally useful. This is in line with #61100 extending the lint to tuples.

Fixes #39524.

cc @rust-lang/lang and @rust-lang/compiler for discussion in case this is a controversial change. In particular, we might want to consider allowing annotations on fields containing `#[must_use]` types in user-defined types (e.g. `#[allow(unused_must_use)]`) to opt out of this behaviour, if there are cases where we this this is likely to have frequent false positives.

(This is based on top of #62235.)
netbsd-srcmastr pushed a commit to NetBSD/pkgsrc that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2019
Pkgsrc changes:
 * Add a patch to llvm to deal with const dli_saddr.
 * Adapt two other patches.
 * Cross-build currently fails, so i386, powerpc and sparc64 bootstrap
   kits for 1.37.0 are built natively.  Missing aarch64 hardware, so that's
   not available yet.
 * Bump bootstrap requirements to 1.36.0 except for armv7-unknown-netbsd-eabihf
   which I've not managed to cross-build.

Upstream changes:

Version 1.37.0 (2019-08-15)
==========================

Language
--------
- `#[must_use]` will now warn if the type is contained in a [tuple][61100],
  [`Box`][62228], or an [array][62235] and unused.
- [You can now use the `cfg` and `cfg_attr` attributes on
  generic parameters.][61547]
- [You can now use enum variants through type alias.][61682] e.g. You can
  write the following:
  ```rust
  type MyOption = Option<u8>;

  fn increment_or_zero(x: MyOption) -> u8 {
      match x {
          MyOption::Some(y) => y + 1,
          MyOption::None => 0,
      }
  }
  ```
- [You can now use `_` as an identifier for consts.][61347] e.g. You can write
  `const _: u32 = 5;`.
- [You can now use `#[repr(align(X)]` on enums.][61229]
- [The  `?`/_"Kleene"_ macro operator is now available in the
  2015 edition.][60932]

Compiler
--------
- [You can now enable Profile-Guided Optimization with the `-C profile-generate`
  and `-C profile-use` flags.][61268] For more information on how to use profile
  guided optimization, please refer to the [rustc book][rustc-book-pgo].
- [The `rust-lldb` wrapper script should now work again.][61827]

Libraries
---------
- [`mem::MaybeUninit<T>` is now ABI-compatible with `T`.][61802]

Stabilized APIs
---------------
- [`BufReader::buffer`]
- [`BufWriter::buffer`]
- [`Cell::from_mut`]
- [`Cell<[T]>::as_slice_of_cells`][`Cell<slice>::as_slice_of_cells`]
- [`DoubleEndedIterator::nth_back`]
- [`Option::xor`]
- [`Wrapping::reverse_bits`]
- [`i128::reverse_bits`]
- [`i16::reverse_bits`]
- [`i32::reverse_bits`]
- [`i64::reverse_bits`]
- [`i8::reverse_bits`]
- [`isize::reverse_bits`]
- [`slice::copy_within`]
- [`u128::reverse_bits`]
- [`u16::reverse_bits`]
- [`u32::reverse_bits`]
- [`u64::reverse_bits`]
- [`u8::reverse_bits`]
- [`usize::reverse_bits`]

Cargo
-----
- [`Cargo.lock` files are now included by default when publishing executable crates
  with executables.][cargo/7026]
- [You can now specify `default-run="foo"` in `[package]` to specify the
  default executable to use for `cargo run`.][cargo/7056]

Misc
----

Compatibility Notes
-------------------
- [Using `...` for inclusive range patterns will now warn by default.][61342]
  Please transition your code to using the `..=` syntax for inclusive
  ranges instead.
- [Using a trait object without the `dyn` will now warn by default.][61203]
  Please transition your code to use `dyn Trait` for trait objects instead.

[62228]: rust-lang/rust#62228
[62235]: rust-lang/rust#62235
[61802]: rust-lang/rust#61802
[61827]: rust-lang/rust#61827
[61547]: rust-lang/rust#61547
[61682]: rust-lang/rust#61682
[61268]: rust-lang/rust#61268
[61342]: rust-lang/rust#61342
[61347]: rust-lang/rust#61347
[61100]: rust-lang/rust#61100
[61203]: rust-lang/rust#61203
[61229]: rust-lang/rust#61229
[60932]: rust-lang/rust#60932
[cargo/7026]: rust-lang/cargo#7026
[cargo/7056]: rust-lang/cargo#7056
[`BufReader::buffer`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/io/struct.BufReader.html#method.buffer
[`BufWriter::buffer`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/io/struct.BufWriter.html#method.buffer
[`Cell::from_mut`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.Cell.html#method.from_mut
[`Cell<slice>::as_slice_of_cells`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.Cell.html#method.as_slice_of_cells
[`DoubleEndedIterator::nth_back`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.DoubleEndedIterator.html#method.nth_back
[`Option::xor`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/enum.Option.html#method.xor
[`RefCell::try_borrow_unguarded`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html#method.try_borrow_unguarded
[`Wrapping::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/num/struct.Wrapping.html#method.reverse_bits
[`i128::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i128.html#method.reverse_bits
[`i16::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i16.html#method.reverse_bits
[`i32::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i32.html#method.reverse_bits
[`i64::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i64.html#method.reverse_bits
[`i8::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.i8.html#method.reverse_bits
[`isize::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.isize.html#method.reverse_bits
[`slice::copy_within`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.slice.html#method.copy_within
[`u128::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u128.html#method.reverse_bits
[`u16::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u16.html#method.reverse_bits
[`u32::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u32.html#method.reverse_bits
[`u64::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u64.html#method.reverse_bits
[`u8::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u8.html#method.reverse_bits
[`usize::reverse_bits`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.usize.html#method.reverse_bits
[rustc-book-pgo]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/profile-guided-optimization.html
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2019
Extend `#[must_use]` to nested structures

Extends the `#[must_use]` lint to apply when `#[must_use]` types are nested within `struct`s (or one-variant `enum`s), making the lint much more generally useful. This is in line with #61100 extending the lint to tuples.

Fixes #39524.

cc @rust-lang/lang and @rust-lang/compiler for discussion in case this is a controversial change. In particular, we might want to consider allowing annotations on fields containing `#[must_use]` types in user-defined types (e.g. `#[allow(unused_must_use)]`) to opt out of this behaviour, if there are cases where we this this is likely to have frequent false positives.

(This is based on top of #62235.)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2019
Extend `#[must_use]` to nested structures

Extends the `#[must_use]` lint to apply when `#[must_use]` types are nested within `struct`s (or one-variant `enum`s), making the lint much more generally useful. This is in line with #61100 extending the lint to tuples.

Fixes #39524.

cc @rust-lang/lang and @rust-lang/compiler for discussion in case this is a controversial change. In particular, we might want to consider allowing annotations on fields containing `#[must_use]` types in user-defined types (e.g. `#[allow(unused_must_use)]`) to opt out of this behaviour, if there are cases where we this this is likely to have frequent false positives.

(This is based on top of #62235.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

tuples containing #[must_use] types should be #[must_use]
8 participants