Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait #56402
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The previous one didn't actually use the Display&Debug bounds in any way, so I think this one is a bit more meaningful.
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
Yeah this seems better. @bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit a3b7a21 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2018
…e, r=Centril Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait The previous one didn't actually use the Display&Debug bounds in any way, so I think this one is a bit more meaningful.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2018
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #55010 (Add template parameter debuginfo to generic types) - #56110 (Consider references and unions potentially inhabited during privacy-respecting inhabitedness checks) - #56305 (update miri) - #56372 (Refer to the second borrow as the "second borrow" in E0501.rs) - #56394 (Deal with EINTR in net timeout tests) - #56395 (Stabilize dbg!(...)) - #56402 (Improve the unstable book example for #56408 [marker] trait) - #56406 (Update RLS and Rustfmt) - #56366 (Stabilize self_in_typedefs feature) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2018
…e, r=Centril Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait The previous one didn't actually use the Display&Debug bounds in any way, so I think this one is a bit more meaningful.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2018
…e, r=Centril Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait The previous one didn't actually use the Display&Debug bounds in any way, so I think this one is a bit more meaningful.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2018
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #56110 (Consider references and unions potentially inhabited during privacy-respecting inhabitedness checks) - #56305 (update miri) - #56366 (Stabilize self_in_typedefs feature) - #56372 (Refer to the second borrow as the "second borrow" in E0501.rs) - #56394 (Deal with EINTR in net timeout tests) - #56395 (Stabilize dbg!(...)) - #56401 (Move VecDeque::resize_with out of the impl<T:Clone> block) - #56402 (Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait) - #56412 (Update tracking issue for `extern_crate_self`) - #56416 (Remove unneeded body class selector) - #56418 (Fix failing tidy (line endings on Windows)) - #56419 (Remove some uses of try!) - #56424 (Mention raw-ident syntax) - #56432 (Update issue number of `shrink_to` methods to point the tracking issue) Failed merges: r? @ghost
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2018
…e, r=Centril Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait The previous one didn't actually use the Display&Debug bounds in any way, so I think this one is a bit more meaningful.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2018
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #56141 ([std] Osstr len clarity) - #56366 (Stabilize self_in_typedefs feature) - #56395 (Stabilize dbg!(...)) - #56401 (Move VecDeque::resize_with out of the impl<T:Clone> block) - #56402 (Improve the unstable book example for #[marker] trait) - #56412 (Update tracking issue for `extern_crate_self`) - #56416 (Remove unneeded body class selector) - #56418 (Fix failing tidy (line endings on Windows)) - #56419 (Remove some uses of try!) - #56432 (Update issue number of `shrink_to` methods to point the tracking issue) - #56433 (Add description about `crate` for parse_visibility's comment) - #56435 (make the C part of compiler-builtins opt-out) - #56438 (Remove not used `DotEq` token) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous one didn't actually use the Display&Debug bounds in any way, so I think this one is a bit more meaningful.